[#9149] Consider implementing privicons
Summary Consider implementing privicons
Queue IMP
Queue Version Git master
Type Enhancement
State Rejected
Priority 1. Low
Requester jan (at) horde (dot) org
Created 2010-07-27 (2888 days ago)
Updated 2013-11-13 (1683 days ago)
Resolved 2013-11-13 (1683 days ago)
Patch No

2013-11-13 05:23:39 Michael Slusarz Comment #3
State ⇒ Rejected
Reply to this comment
0 traction on this.  Rejecting.
2011-12-06 06:27:09 Michael Slusarz Comment #2 Reply to this comment
Better link: http://privicons.org/

Doesn't appear to be a whole bunch of momentum behind this, but 
implementing would be straightforward, at least with respect to adding 
the privicon information in a Header (Section 2.4 of the RFC draft).

On the other hand, putting privicon information in the message subject 
and/or body is just stupid, annoying, and confusing as hell.   
Especially on a MUA that doesn't support privicons - the ASCII text 
icons mean absolutely nothing.
2010-07-27 09:25:53 Jan Schneider Comment #1
Type ⇒ Enhancement
State ⇒ Accepted
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
Summary ⇒ Consider implementing privicons
Queue ⇒ IMP
Milestone ⇒
Patch ⇒ No
Reply to this comment

Saved Queries