What does "1.3 + 2.0" mean as a version number? This definitely hasn't 
changed in Safari 1.3, and 2.0 was out and tested when this was last 
looked at afaik.

The situation seems to have changed here with Safari 1.3 + 2.0, which 
now appears to support the min-height property.



When I remove the "#menu" element from themes/safari.css, the menu 
items appear to render correctly in Safari 1.3.2(v312.6) + 
2.0.4(419.3), and the height of the menu <div> expands as the menu 
items wrap.



I suggest this ticket be reopened and that horde specify "overflow: 
visible" only to Safari = <125.12 (1.2.4).

Looks like there is no solution at the moment. If someone is coming up 
with one, we can re-open the ticket.

Well, I'm not sure if we can do anything about this - we specify 
overflow:visible; on the menu for Safari, and that doesn't expand the 
height. Safari doesn't support min-height, so that doesn't work. And 
overflow:auto produces bizarre results (just tried it).



So we'll certainly take a patch for it, but I don't know what the solution is.

Running Safari 2.0 on OSX Tiger.  When the window size is dragged 
smaller, the bar holding all the menu buttons does not expand when the 
window gets too small for all the icons to fit across the top.  On the 
PC using Firefox, the bar expands to double its width to accomodate 
the second row of menu buttons.  In Safari, the bar does not expand, 
but the icons move down a row, thus appearing to be floating in limbo. 
  Since the text of the buttons is white, if the background color is 
also white the text vanishes, leaving disembodied icons floating there 
without context.  Highlighting the buttons reveals the text, however.