Summary | Manually bounce back message |
Queue | IMP |
Queue Version | Git master |
Type | Enhancement |
State | Rejected |
Priority | 1. Low |
Owners | |
Requester | viktor (at) szepe (dot) net |
Created | 10/08/2015 (3557 days ago) |
Due | |
Updated | 01/13/2016 (3460 days ago) |
Assigned | |
Resolved | 01/13/2016 (3460 days ago) |
Milestone | |
Patch | No |
spamming yourself.
Only if you determine that a message is spam during delivery, it makes
sense to reject a message (so that senders of false positives get
notified), other than that you have nothing to gain by bouncing a
message and effectively you become part of the problem as a spam
reflector (which will attract more spam, rather than lower it).
See http://www.dontbouncespam.org/#BVR
State ⇒ New
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Summary ⇒ Manually bounce back message
Queue ⇒ IMP
Milestone ⇒
Patch ⇒ No
optionally - could be bounces back as there was no such address on the
server.
Thank you for your consideration.