6.0.0-beta1
11/6/25

[#5393] Turba generates syntactically wrong adresses for IMP
Summary Turba generates syntactically wrong adresses for IMP
Queue Turba
Queue Version 2.1.3
Type Bug
State Resolved
Priority 2. Medium
Owners
Requester Otto.Stolz (at) uni-konstanz (dot) de
Created 05/23/2007 (6742 days ago)
Due
Updated 06/14/2007 (6720 days ago)
Assigned 05/25/2007 (6740 days ago)
Resolved 06/14/2007 (6720 days ago)
Github Issue Link
Github Pull Request
Milestone
Patch No

History
06/14/2007 01:39:13 AM Chuck Hagenbuch Comment #8
State ⇒ Resolved
Reply to this comment
I can't reproduce this with HEAD, either.
06/13/2007 11:59:58 AM Jan Schneider Comment #7 Reply to this comment
So, did you try the latest code?
05/27/2007 10:01:50 AM Jan Schneider Comment #6 Reply to this comment
This is relevant because not being able to reproduce it could mean 
that is has been fixed already. And you are not even using the latest 
stable versions.
05/26/2007 07:14:46 PM otto (dot) stolz (at) uni-konstanz (dot) de Comment #5 Reply to this comment
You have indicated your Turba version as being  2.1.3
My current versions are indeed: Horde 3.1.3, Imp H3 (4.1.3)  und Turba 
H3 (2.1.3).



However, I have retrofitted one or two CVS patches to it, as discussed 
in tickets #3392,  perhaps #5327 (I am not in my office to check the 
latter, until June 9th). I do not think that that is relevant for this 
new bug, though.


05/26/2007 06:32:15 PM Michael Rubinsky Comment #4 Reply to this comment
What is FW_3 code?
FW_3 = Framework_3 - the CVS branch for the latest stable releases.   
(You have indicated your Turba version as being  2.1.3)  CVS HEAD is 
the latest development code.


05/26/2007 06:07:02 PM otto (dot) stolz (at) uni-konstanz (dot) de Comment #3 Reply to this comment
I see this in CVS HEAD, but not with the FW_3 code.
You are asking for feedback, but, sorry,  I do not understand your remark.

What is FW_3 code?

And what question am I supposed to answer?
05/25/2007 05:29:49 PM Jan Schneider Comment #2
State ⇒ Feedback
Reply to this comment
I see this in CVS HEAD, but not with the FW_3 code.
05/23/2007 11:51:06 AM Otto (dot) Stolz (at) uni-konstanz (dot) de Comment #1
Priority ⇒ 2. Medium
State ⇒ Unconfirmed
Queue ⇒ Turba
Summary ⇒ Turba generates syntactically wrong adresses for IMP
Type ⇒ Bug
Reply to this comment
One way to start message composition (IMP) is to click on the E-Mail 
field of some entry, in the adressbook listing (Turba). Now, when the 
pertinent Name field contains a comma, IMP will get the To field wrong.



Example:

- Adressbook entry:

   · Name: Stolz, Otto

   · Alias: Kommatest

   · E-Mail: otto.stolz@uni-konstanz.de

- To field:

    ·  as displayed in the Compose form: \"Stolz, Otto\" 
<otto.stolz@uni-konstanz.de>

    ·  as sent in the message: "\"Stolz"@uni-konstanz.de, "Otto\"" 
<otto.stolz@uni-konstanz.de>

- Message will be sent to: <Stolz>, <@uni-konstanz.de>, 
<otto.stolz@uni-konstanz.de>

- Entry  added to the addressbook:

   · Name:  "\"Stolz"

   · Alias:

   · E-Mail: &quot;\&quot;Stolz&quot;@uni-konstanz.de



In contrast, if the address is fetched via IMP's search, or expand, 
function (Address Book, or Expand Names options, respectively, in the 
Compose Message form), then the address will be alright.



Example:

- Adressbook entry: as above

  - To field:

    ·  as displayed in the Compose form: "Stolz, Otto" 
<otto.stolz@uni-konstanz.de>

    ·  as sent in the message: "Stolz, Otto" <otto.stolz@uni-konstanz.de>

- Message will be sent to: <otto.stolz@uni-konstanz.de>

- No entry  added to the addressbook.






Saved Queries