Tickets :: Comment on [#9432] Unable to mark messages as "read" in the dynamic view

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: . ..__ .___.. ..__ \|\ \|[__) \| \| \|\| \ \| \\|\| \| \|/\\|\|__/
Comment	>> But I have to admit that I would expect the one or the other user to >> have similar problems as this double negation is maybe not what every >> one would expect. > > This has been changed with the flag changes pushed within the last month. > >> Is there a specific reason to split into "Mark as/Unmark as"? My >> expectation would be that the client only offers the markers that are >> actually available for a given message. Or a set of messages. But >> things become undeniable more difficult if the user selected several >> messages at the same time. > > Yes - the issue is with multiple message selection - there's not a > tremendously clean way of handling this in that case. > > I would not be against having a single 'Mark As...' submenu, and then > having checkmarks (or an equivalent UI element) indicating which > flags are currently set - selecting a flag would toggle that flag. > One drawback of this approach is that the UI between dimp and imp > would not parallel each other - in IMP there is not really a clean > way of doing this without listing both Mark and Unmark. But maybe we > don't care about UI continuity between the different displays (?)
Attachment
Watch this ticket