6.0.0-beta6
▾
Tasks
New Task
Search
Photos
Wiki
▾
Tickets
New Ticket
Search
dev.horde.org
Toggle Alerts Log
Help
4/10/26
H
istory
A
ttachments
C
omment
W
atch
Download
Comment on [#6825] OR-combination for flags
*
Your Email Address
*
Spam protection
Enter the letters below:
.__ .__ __.. . . | \[__)(__ |_/ | |__/| .__)| \\__|
Comment
> I've added auto-updating for old VF rules, so the main element of > this ticket has been completed. > > > >> Just read my earlier post again and think I should clarify the > >> relation between the different versions of search: > >> > >>> (and/or) and (and) < and/or < (and/or) and/or (and/or) > >>> < ?? > >> > >> The order I gave represents the usefulness (in my eyes!) of the >> original search, Michael´s patched search, and my proposed search, >> not their expressiveness. > >> > >> Michael´s patched version describes a set of searches not completely >> covering the original, so no backward compatibility. However, it has >> increased usability by exhibiting a better comprehensibility for the >> users. > >> > >> The proposed version is a superset of both the original and the >> Michael´s, so backward compatibility is given (once the save format >> is handled), although it has a slightly more complex GUI. For me, it >> is a good trade-off between expressiveness and usability. > > > > BC is *not* given with this format. It would require complex > retooling of both current virtual folder rules and development of a > new, internal format to save the rules. This is much more than a > trivial change. > > > > It is a worthy goal, just not one that appears appropriate for IMP > 4.2. Moving to another ticket.
Attachment
Watch this ticket
N
ew Ticket
M
y Tickets
S
earch
Q
uery Builder
R
eports
Saved Queries
Open Bugs
Bugs waiting for Feedback
Open Bugs in Releases
Open Enhancements
Enhancements waiting for Feedback
Bugs with Patches
Enhancements with Patches
Release Showstoppers
Stalled Tickets
New Tickets
Horde 5 Showstoppers