Tickets :: Comment on [#6825] OR-combination for flags

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: __ . .__ .___.. . / `\| [__) _/ \|_/ \__.\|___[__)./__.\| \
Comment	> testing IMP 4.2 with most of the other current modules. Am I correct > that searches are built by one of the following two modes? > > > > All Queries: AND( AND(CRIT_1, CRIT_2, ...) AND(FLAG_1, FLAG_2, ...) ) > > Any Queries: AND( OR(CRIT_1, CRIT_2, ...) AND(FLAG_1, FLAG_2, ...) ) > > > > > > My understanding is that it is not possible to do imap searches for > OR-combination of flags, correct? (e.g. all new OR unanswered > messages). > > > > That could be fixed by making "search flags" on par with the "search > criteria", i.e. applying the all/any-switch to flags as well. Even > better: provide three all/any-switches for search criteria, search > flags and their combination: > > > > AND/OR( AND/OR(crit_1, crit_2, ...), AND/OR(FLAG_1, FLAG_2, ...) ) > > > > That would enormously extend the space of possible searches by still > avoiding a complex GUI for the general nesting of logical operators. > > > > > > > > Furthermore two little glitches in the current GUI: > > - In "recent searches", the flags are not mentioned. > > - "Search Flags" for all the imap flags, but "flagged message" > > for only the important flag. > > > > > > Martin > >
Attachment
Watch this ticket