6.0.0-beta1
▾
Tasks
New Task
Search
Photos
Wiki
▾
Tickets
New Ticket
Search
dev.horde.org
Toggle Alerts Log
Help
9/10/25
H
istory
A
ttachments
C
omment
W
atch
Download
Comment on [#6686] Vacation and forward conflict in SunOne LDAP schema
*
Your Email Address
*
Spam protection
Enter the letters below:
. ..__ . ..__ . . |\/|[__)|__|[__)|_/ | |[__)| |[__)| \
Comment
> This isn't totally unique to LDAP. If you use the .forward setup for > vacation and > > forwards, they also overwrite eachother since they use the same .forward file > > and don't really know about each other (as well as any other uses of > the .forward > > file). > > > > To fix this, you would need "intellegent" parsing of the contents of > the field/file/etc > > so as to "update" it intellegently rather than simply replacing or > removing the > > contents. Doing such work reliably may be problematic depending on the > > contents of the field and how it can be updated by other sources, etc. > > > > Maybe it is better to focus on Ingo for such advanced settings, > rather than continuing > > such complex work on Sork? > > > > IMHO, in order to implement the requested feature, we would need to know all > > possible values of maildeliveryoption and what the syntax of the contents is. > > Then build something which understands that syntax and knows the options, > > and can manipulate them in a safe way. Doing that for LDAP is probably > > much easier than for a .forward file, but you still never know if some other > > software might use the maildeliveryoption in a non-standard way or something. > >
Attachment
Watch this ticket
N
ew Ticket
M
y Tickets
S
earch
Q
uery Builder
R
eports
Saved Queries
Open Bugs
Bugs waiting for Feedback
Open Bugs in Releases
Open Enhancements
Enhancements waiting for Feedback
Bugs with Patches
Enhancements with Patches
Release Showstoppers
Stalled Tickets
New Tickets
Horde 5 Showstoppers