Tickets :: Comment on [#657] HTML editing broken if services/editor not a subdirectory of Horde webroot

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: ._..__.. . __ . \| \| \|\|__\|/ `\| _\|_\|__\\| \|\__.\|___
Comment	> It ties in with the other bug ID I mentioned, with regards to making > Horde tools integrate with Giapeto and other CMS-es. > > > > In the implementation I'm working on, there are only two more "bugs" > which are stopping it from going live inside this CMS, both of which > relate to services/editor/htmlarea.js in the Horde system. > > > > In this setup, they are outside the normal webroot, and hence are > generating a 404 error, which has the knock on effect of causing > Javascript errors, thusly (using Mozilla JavaScript console, edited > for client confidentiality): > > > > Error: syntax error. > > Source File: {snip}/services/editor/htmlarea/htmlarea.js > > > > Error: HTMLArea is not defined > > Source File: {snip}/services/javascript.php?file=htmlarea_lang.js&app=horde > > > > Error: HTMLArea is not defined > > Source File: {snip}/{snip}/mail/compose.php?uniq={token snipped} > > > > This comes about (I think entirely, but maybe just in the first > instance) because htmlarea.js can't be loaded because the Horde tree > is outside the CMS, aside from the contents of the application > graphics (which I do have the option to put there), but because > there's no config option to put the scripts there, and I can't really > put the javascript inside the horde tree visible to the web either, > it's a bit broken. > > > > So I guess it's more a feature request to put a registry.php option > in there so we can put the scripts somewhere outside of the horde > source tree. > > > > I'd hack it myself, but I'm not sure where to start (although I think > hacking addScriptFile[?] in the Horde libs would be the place), and > if I did, it would probably disagree with the "horde way", and since > Chuck has asked if I can write a Horde-inside-a-CMS HOWTO I'd rather > check with you guys about how this would be implemented too. > > > > K. > >
Attachment
Watch this ticket

Saved Queries