Tickets :: Comment on [#5775] Virtual Inbox and Trash Missing At Start of Session

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: .. ..__..___ __ \|\ /\| \|[__ / ` \__\| \/ \|__\|[___\__.
Comment	> I created a virtual folder and confirmed that the existence of a > user-defined virtual folder doesn't resolve this bug. In fact, the > user-defined virtual folder doesn't appear either. Upon updating > either of the Virtual Inbox or Trash options, the system-defined > folders and virtual folder all appear. > > > > BTW, even turning off one of these two options will cause the rest of > the enabled virtual folders to appear. In other words, any change to > either of these two options will cause all enabled virtual folders to > appear. > > > > I also toggled each of the other settings under IMP options under the > two sections that these two properties appear in (i.e. Server and > Folder Information, Deleting and Moving Messages). Each of these > settings is properly loaded at session startup. > > > > It's a weird bug. I'm going to look through the code tonight. > > > >>> I have a single IMP user with Virtual Inbox and Trash turned on for > >>> the account. Upon the start of a session, the Virtual Inbox and > >>> Trash are missing from the folder drop-down. When I check the user's > >>> IMP options, both the Virtual Inbox and Trash options are turned on. > >>> > >>> If I turn either of the two options off, save, and turn it back on, > >>> both the Virtual Inbox and Trash reappear and persist for the scope > >>> of the session. Merely viewing the options does not affect this > >>> change. > >>> > >>> I suspect these preferences aren't being loaded correctly at the > >>> start of the session, and who knows, maybe other preferences aren't > >>> loaded either; my configuration largely uses defaults, so I wouldn't > >>> know. > >> > >> Who else should know this if not you. Check that first. Beside that > >> as you explained in the paragraph above, the options seem be loaded > >> fine. > >> > >>> I also don't have any other virtual folders defined, so IDK if the > >>> existence of one of these would trigger the proper loading of these > >>> system virtual folders. > >> > >> Then try it. > >
Attachment
Watch this ticket

Saved Queries