Tickets :: Comment on [#2371] supporting contact lists in LDAP backend

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: .___. . __. __ .__. [__ \|\/\|(__ / `\| \| \| \| \|.__)\__.\|__\
Comment	> Well, I don't see any better standard to store groups of contacts in > LDAP. Unfortunately I found no client fully supporting groupOfNames > :-(. But those clients I tested (outlook, mozilla*, evolution, > kaddressbook) can't store / read group of contacts (lists) into LDAP. > Only Outlook can read groups, but shows no members (there are several > discussions about that on the internet with no result). > > > >> the change to Object.php is duplicative > > this was patch against turba-h3-2.0.3-rc1 > > > >> and why the change to browse.php > > because target can be of type PEAR_Error and then $target->isGroup() > is fatal. But anyway in Turba the error handling is implemented only > partially. > > > > Anyway, in our case changes to Object.php and browse.php are not neccessary. > > > >> If all the changes were localized to the LDAP driver I'd feel better >> about it > > > > as you wish ... done > > > >> What kinds of ids do other clients store in a groupOfNames object? > > In groupOfNames can be stored any references. The syntax of every > reference must be valid DN. > > > >> I'm guessing we couldn't store ids for non-LDAP contacts this way, >> which we can do the current way. > > No, you can't. But I don't know the current way. I found no > sources.php example using LDAP and contact lists. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I've prepared a new patch. The only modified file is ldap.php. In > sources.php one can indicate using of groupOfNames by setting > $params['use_groupOfNames'] = true; > > > > Moreover $map must contain theese fields: > > '__key' => 'dn', > > '__type' => '__type', > > '__members' => '__members', > > 'objectclass' => 'objectclass', > > 'member' => 'member', > > 'name' => 'cn', > > > > If anyone has any more suggestions to this patch then please try to > implement it on your own or write a comment here :-)
Attachment
Watch this ticket

Saved Queries