Tickets :: Comment on [#2305] Problems with virtual folders

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: .. ,.__ .__ ._. \| \./ [__)[__) \| \__\| \| \| \\| _\|_
Comment	>> This looks like it has been resolved - namely that we are not going > >> through the overhead in the sidebar to display the requested data > >> because the punishment far exceeds the payment. > > > > Except I'd say its better to display NO information about message > counts in the side bar, than it is to display inaccurate information. > I only use Virtual Trash at home at this point, and I don't get very > many messages, but I do rely almost exclusively on the message counts > in the side bar to notify me of new mail, at least at this point. > And it still gets annoying if I click on my INBOX because I think I > have new mail, only to find none, and then remember that its the > unread messages in Virtual Trash. Normal end-users don't understand > or care about the different parameters that imap_search and > imap_status take and I can see a number of support requests coming in > if we were to use Virtual Trash in production, about messages not > showing up. > > > > How about a compromise that would leave the behavior the way it > currently is, if not using Virtual Trash. But if using Virtual > Trash, use imap_search instead, so numbers are accurate. > > > > Do you have any benchmarks for the amount of overhead that > imap_search adds, vs. using imap_status, to get # of messages, > unseen, and new messages?
Attachment
Watch this ticket