Tickets :: Comment on [#14368] Improve EAS performance with large History tables

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: __. ..__ __ . (__ \|\| \/ ` \| .__)\__\|\|__/\__.\__\|
Comment	>> What about adding a composite index on history_action, object_uid? >> Since mysql uses the index that returns the least number of rows, >> this should improve performance when the modseq range is extremely >> high. > > I tried a few different indexes with different modseq ranges for this > query on an idle mysql server: > > 700k 120k 30k > 1 history_modseq 1.61 0.34 0.08 > 2 history_action 2.25 2.16 2.13 > 3 object_uid 0.62 0.65 0.64 > 4 history_action, object_uid 0.60 0.43 0.42 > 5 history_action, history_modseq, object_uid 0.50 0.13 0.02 > 6 history_modseq, object_uid 0.39 0.13 0.02 > > This was order of the preferred indexes on a mysql 5.6 server: > 700k: 4, 2 > 120k: 5, 4, 2 > 30k: 5, 1 > > The history_action index seems to cause more problems than it helps, > but it might be useful for other queries. The fasted index was never > selected, so we will probably patch our local Horde installation to > force the last index for these queries. > > It would still be nice to prevent these long modseq ranges. Would it > be possible to use a specific UPDATE query that only changes the > modseq if every other field is unchanged and the sync_timestamp is a > week in the past or could that still lead to data loss?
Attachment
Watch this ticket