Tickets :: Comment on [#12441] JS error during mailbox loading

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: .__..__ \ /. .. . [__][__) >< \|\/\|\|\ \| \| \|\| \/ \\| \|\| \\|
Comment	> Here's the IMAP log of opening that mailbox and reading that message > using mutt. > > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4> a0001 CAPABILITY > a0002 LIST "" "" > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN > NAMESPACE THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE > AUTH=PLAIN ACL ACL2=UNION > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< a0001 OK CAPABILITY completed > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * LIST (\Noselect) "." "" > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< a0002 OK LIST completed > > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Selecting INBOX... > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4> a0003 MYRIGHTS "INBOX" > a0004 STATUS "INBOX.Drafts" (MESSAGES) > a0005 SELECT "INBOX" > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * MYRIGHTS "INBOX" "acdilrsw" > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Handling MYRIGHTS > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Unknown right: " > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Unknown right: " > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< a0003 OK MYRIGHTS completed. > > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< a0004 NO Mailbox does not exist, or must be > subscribed to. > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted > \Seen \Recent) > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered > \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * 1 EXISTS > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Handling EXISTS > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] cmd_handle_untagged: New mail in INBOX - 1 > messages total. > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * 0 RECENT > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1370196747] Ok > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< a0005 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok > > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Fetching message headers... 0/1 (0%) > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4> a0006 FETCH 1:1 (UID FLAGS INTERNALDATE > RFC822.SIZE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC > MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO > REPLY-TO LINES LIST-POST X-LABEL)]) > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< * 1 FETCH (UID 4649 FLAGS (\Seen) > INTERNALDATE "08-Jan-2012 19:31:49 +0000" RFC822.SIZE 737 > BODY[HEADER.FIELDS ("DATE" "FROM" "SUBJECT" "TO" "CC" "MESSAGE-ID" > "REFERENCES" "CONTENT-TYPE" "CONTENT-DESCRIPTION" "IN-REPLY-TO" > "REPLY-TO" "LINES" "LIST-POST" "X-LABEL")] {423} > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] imap_read_literal: reading 423 bytes > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< ) > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] 4< a0006 OK FETCH completed. > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Overriding UIDNEXT: 0 -> 4650 > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] imap_open_mailbox: msgcount is 1 > [2013-07-10 06:37:29] Sorting mailbox... > > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Fetching message... > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] 4> a0007 UID FETCH 4649 BODY.PEEK[] > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] 4< * 1 FETCH (UID 4649 BODY[] {737} > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Fetching message... 0K/0.7K (0%) > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] imap_read_literal: reading 737 bytes > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Fetching message... 0K/0.7K (0%) > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] 4< ) > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] 4< a0007 OK FETCH completed. > > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] WEED is Set > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: from matches From: > =?US-ASCII?Q?Keith_Moore?= <moore@cs.utk.edu> > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: x = 1; hdr_count = 6 > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: to matches To: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Keld_J=F8rn_Simonsen?= <keld@dkuug.dk>, "Blah" > <blah@example.com> > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: x = 2; hdr_count = 6 > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: cc matches CC: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Pirard <PIRARD@vm1.ulg.ac.be> > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: x = 3; hdr_count = 6 > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: subject matches Subject: > =?ISO-8859-1?B?SWYgeW91IGNhbiByZWFkIHRoaXMgeW8=?= > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: x = 4; hdr_count = 6 > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: x = 4; hdr_count = 6 > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: date matches Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 > 14:31:46 -0500 > [2013-07-10 06:37:42] Reorder: x = 0; hdr_count = 6 > [2013-07-10 06:38:33] Mailbox is unchanged. > > I see what you mean about it being less-efficient, but perhaps it > could be used a fall-back mode by IMP. It would be less-efficient, > slower, but it would increase compatibility.
Attachment
Watch this ticket

Saved Queries