6.0.0-beta1
▾
Tasks
New Task
Search
Photos
Wiki
▾
Tickets
New Ticket
Search
dev.horde.org
Toggle Alerts Log
Help
8/18/25
H
istory
A
ttachments
C
omment
W
atch
Download
Comment on [#11376] Itip auto-accept requests
*
Your Email Address
*
Spam protection
Enter the letters below:
.__..___ ..___. , [__][__ |[__ \./ | || \__|[___ |
Comment
>> That depends. Within an organization (for "local" addresses) it is >> trivial to prevent users from forging sender addresses. In that case >> there is no attack vector, since people will not be able to forge >> replies. > > This was a potential solution that the client and I have discussed. > Although I would disagree with the idea that it is "trivial" to > prevent users from forging sender addresses. Imagine an organization > like a university that may have 100,000+ users, and these users may > be in a variety of differently admin'd local networks (e.g. Physics > department, Economics department, etc.). Additionally, the > e-mail/user the invite was sent to may not match the responding user > (e.g. sent to slusarz@example.com but my mail is sent from > Michael.Slusarz@department.example.com) so forging addresses becomes > a more complicated situation. > >> But this is only the case for addresses we know are local, >> replies from external (non-local) users should probably never be >> auto-accepted. At the very least, there should be an option to treat >> local and non-local users differently. > > That being said, I would agree that we should provide an option for > the admin to allow auto-accepting of e-mails from within the same > domain. Or better still, allow the admin to provide a list of > domains to auto-accept from.
Attachment
Watch this ticket
N
ew Ticket
M
y Tickets
S
earch
Q
uery Builder
R
eports
Saved Queries
Open Bugs
Bugs waiting for Feedback
Open Bugs in Releases
Open Enhancements
Enhancements waiting for Feedback
Bugs with Patches
Enhancements with Patches
Release Showstoppers
Stalled Tickets
New Tickets
Horde 5 Showstoppers