Tickets :: Comment on [#2112] CVS Activity Log/Monitor

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: . ..__.. . __ . . \| \|\| \|\| \|/ `\|\ \| \|__\|\|__\|\|__\|\__.\| \\|
Comment	> Some ideas from Michael Naberezny via IRC log: > > > > [16:39] <mnaberez> seems chora could just page cache, and all the > commit hook would need > > to do is invalidate the cache > > [16:41] <mnaberez> that doesn't help with the timeline, but that's > something that can > > just be generated once with `svn log` and page cached, and then > invalidated by the hook. > > reporting and storing all kinds of stats is hard > > [16:43] <cjh> also harder for cvs > > [16:44] <mnaberez> cjh: in what sense? > > [16:45] <cjh> generating a timeline for the whole repository in CVS > is a royal pain > > [16:49] <mnaberez> cjh: if the stats were generated per commit by the > repository hook, > > features like timeline would only work from the time after the hook > was installed. it > > seems you'd need to collect that back information from the repository anyway. > > [17:03] <cjh> right, but you could do it once and then update it > incrementally > > [17:03] <cjh> instead of all at once when it was invalidated > > [17:06] <mnaberez> cjh: this is why i suggested that it might > invalidate a page cache. > > if the hook reported a file changed, you would invalidate the cached > page for that file's > > directory, and invalidate the first page of the timeline. that's > straightforward, and > > then the same mechanism is always used to generate those pages > > [17:07] <cjh> ah > > [17:13] <mnaberez> cjh: i think collecting statistics would be much > more interesting, but > > also much harder. i guess it depends on what the goals are (make > chora faster vs more > > features) > >
Attachment
Watch this ticket

Saved Queries