This should not be in our bugs system.

Take a look at http://yourhost/horde/test.php  It should give you all 
the version info you need for us.

Hey, beg my pardon, but I am new to supporting email programs here. 
Tell me exactly what you want and I will provide you with it. We are 
forwarding this to you because we cannot find out why or reproduce 
this error ourselves. Horde v 2.2.5 is what we appear to be using.

You are confused. IMAP is not involved anywhere in sending outgoing mail.



The headers seem to indicate that you're using IMP 4.0.3. Is this 
true? What Horde version are you using? How, specifically, do you 
expect us to try to reproduce/debug this?

Ignore my first post then. Heres the headers and error messages and 
SMTP logs from those emails. What is going on is that when someone 
sends an email from Webmail, somewhere between there and the SMTP 
server (using IMAP protocol) email addresses of recipients are being 
lost. This is an intermittant thing and is happening with emails 
having attachments for only a few particular users. The example shown 
has one person sending to 40 recipients, but only 39 appear when SMTP 
receives it. The forwarded message shows julia.wright@dal.ca from 
someone who successfully received it, but she does not get the email 
herself even tho she is listed. SMTP shows she is not on the list. The 
other is another example of an error.









Here are the email headers:





1.

----- Forwarded message from Jason.Haslam@dal.ca -----

Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:43:13 -0300

From: Jason Haslam <Jason.Haslam@dal.ca>

Reply-To: Jason Haslam <Jason.Haslam@dal.ca>

Subject: Fwd: A form-fillable travel claim form

To: "Wright, Julia " <julia.wright@dal.ca>

2.

------------------------ Headers of message sent by Andrew Wainwright 
-------------



Return-Path: <Andrew.Wainwright@Dal.Ca>

Received: (from apache@localhost)

by KIL-UPT-3.UCIS.Dal.Ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j8FIkdKw020155;

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

Received: from AWainwright.English.Dal.Ca (AWainwright.English.Dal.Ca

[129.173.64.115]) by my3.dal.ca (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for

<darl@dal.ca>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

Message-ID: <20050915154639.g2w4jyvgjs8w40ss@my3.dal.ca>

Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

From: JA Wainwright <Andrew.Wainwright@Dal.Ca>

To: acompton@unbsj.ca

Cc: paulmilton@telus.net, tremblay@stthomasu.ca, creelman@unbsj.ca,

afurlong@upei.ca, alan.young@acadiau.ca, cnicholson@ed.ac.uk,

fuller@hhs.bham.ac.uk, john.baxter@Dal.Ca, carrie.dawson@Dal.Ca

Subject: Literary Atlas

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Disposition: inline

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)



--------------------- Error Message recived by Andrew.Wainwright 
----------------------



Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300 [15:46:39 ADT]

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@KIL-UPT-3.UCIS.Dal.Ca>Add 
to Address

book (MAILER-DAEMON@KIL-UPT-3.UCIS.Dal.Ca) Canada

To: Andrew.Wainwright@dal.caAdd to Address book (Andrew.Wainwright@dal.ca)

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

Part(s): Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

Headers: Show All Headers

Error

ERROR: Your message could not be delivered.

The mail server generated the following error message:



The original message was received at Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

from apache@localhost



----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

@

(reason: 550 5.1.1 User unknown)



----- Transcript of session follows -----

550 5.1.1 @... User unknown



Info

Additional message error details can be viewed HERE.

The text of the returned message can be viewed HERE.



---------------------------









Here are the SMTP logs:



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There were 40 recipients listed in the text of the email. The SMTP logs

only show 39 recipients being passed in the SMTP protocol, the one missing

address being Julia Wright's. Here are the details:



Here is the date and sender of the message:



Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:37:30 -0300

From: Carole Poirier <Carole.Poirier@Dal.Ca>



Here is the initial smtp.dal.ca log entry for the email, showing that

there were 39 recipients:



Sep 7 13:37:31 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31761]: j87GbVZL031761:

from=<Carole.Poirier@Dal.Ca>, size=143011, class=0, nrcpts=39,

msgid=<20050907133730.xay6bflhe90k4s08@my5.dal.ca>, proto=ESMTP,

daemon=MTA, relay=KIL-UPT-5.UCIS.Dal.Ca [129.173.1.165]



Then there is a log message showing the email was split into two queue 
entries:



Sep 7 13:37:31 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31761]: j87GbVZL031761: split:

count=1, id=j87GbVZM031761



Here are the log entries that list the recipients of the email:



Sep 7 13:37:31 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<william.barker@ukings.ns.ca>, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00,

mailer=smtp, pri=1313011, relay=admin.ukings.ns.ca.

[134.190.92.50], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Data received OK.)



Sep 7 13:37:32 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<ar199@chebucto.ns.ca>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01,

mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011, relay=lich.chebucto.ns.ca.

[192.75.95.79], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (S90733AbVIGQhb message

accepted)



Sep 7 13:37:32 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<clarekeating@hfx.e astlink.ca>, delay=00:00:01,

xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011,

relay=smtpin.eastlink.ca. [24.222.0.18], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (ok:

Message 359371087 accepted)

Sep 7 13:37:36 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<jswan@supercity.ns.ca>, delay=00:00:05, xdelay=00:00:04,

mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011, relay=mail.supercity.ns.ca.

[24.222.76.31], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued as49B03CA6DC)



Sep 7 13:37:32 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31770]: j87GbVZM031761:

to=<carole.poirier@Dal.Ca>,<gradengl@Dal.Ca>,<mkenney@Dal.Ca>,<jstreete@Dal.Ca>,

<darl@Dal.Ca>,<jthompso@Dal.Ca>,<tetro@Dal.Ca>,<mistone@Dal.Ca>,<afstewar@Dal.Ca>,

<tross@Dal.Ca>,<ngrobert@Dal.Ca>,<kenneth.paradis@Dal.Ca>,<hmeek@Dal.Ca>,

<dmcneil@Dal.Ca>,<dmatthia@Dal.Ca>,<ann.martin@Dal.Ca>,<rmaitzen@Dal.Ca>,

<t.macgregor@Dal.Ca>,<sluo@Dal.Ca>,<luckyj@Dal.Ca>,<rleitch@Dal.Ca>,

<sean.lawrence@Dal.Ca>,<dean.irvine@Dal.Ca>,<rhuebert@Dal.Ca>,

<jason.haslam@Dal.Ca>,<greenfld@Dal.Ca>,<mfurrow@Dal.Ca>,<dhevans@Dal.Ca>,

<IV610512@Dal.Ca>,<diepev@Dal.Ca>,<cvdawson@Dal.Ca>,<lchoyce@Dal.Ca>,

<abrittan@Dal.Ca>,<lyn.bennett@Dal.Ca>,<jbaxter@Dal.Ca>,

delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011,

relay=imap.ucis.dal.ca. [129.173.1.98], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent

(j87GbVtP022718 Message accepted for delivery)

This is really hard to follow. Please strip the report to a readable 
size, summarizing what you found so far. Or point us to an URL in your 
own bug tracker.

This is a ticket we have outlining a problem found that we cannot seem 
to find the source of. Am forwarding to you to see if this is a 
possible bug with WebMail. It appears that Webmail might be dropping 
email addresses along the way for certain people. Here are our ticket 
details:



Entered on 09/19/2005 at 11:56:32 by ae@dal.ca:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There were 40 recipients listed in the text of the email. The SMTP logs

only show 39 recipients being passed in the SMTP protocol, the one missing

address being Julia Wright's. Here are the details:



Here is the date and sender of the message:



Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:37:30 -0300

From: Carole Poirier <Carole.Poirier@Dal.Ca>



Here is the initial smtp.dal.ca log entry for the email, showing that

there were 39 recipients:



Sep 7 13:37:31 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31761]: j87GbVZL031761:

from=<Carole.Poirier@Dal.Ca>, size=143011, class=0, nrcpts=39,

msgid=<20050907133730.xay6bflhe90k4s08@my5.dal.ca>, proto=ESMTP,

daemon=MTA, relay=KIL-UPT-5.UCIS.Dal.Ca [129.173.1.165]



Then there is a log message showing the email was split into two queue 
entries:



Sep 7 13:37:31 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31761]: j87GbVZL031761: split:

count=1, id=j87GbVZM031761



Here are the log entries that list the recipients of the email:



Sep 7 13:37:31 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<william.barker@ukings.ns.ca>, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00,

mailer=smtp, pri=1313011, relay=admin.ukings.ns.ca.

[134.190.92.50], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Data received OK.)



Sep 7 13:37:32 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<ar199@chebucto.ns.ca>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01,

mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011, relay=lich.chebucto.ns.ca.

[192.75.95.79], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (S90733AbVIGQhb message

accepted)



Sep 7 13:37:32 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<clarekeating@hfx.e astlink.ca>, delay=00:00:01,

xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011,

relay=smtpin.eastlink.ca. [24.222.0.18], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (ok:

Message 359371087 accepted)

Sep 7 13:37:36 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31768]: j87GbVZL031761:

to=<jswan@supercity.ns.ca>, delay=00:00:05, xdelay=00:00:04,

mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011, relay=mail.supercity.ns.ca.

[24.222.76.31], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued as49B03CA6DC)



Sep 7 13:37:32 KIL-SM-1 sendmail[31770]: j87GbVZM031761:

to=<carole.poirier@Dal.Ca>,<gradengl@Dal.Ca>,<mkenney@Dal.Ca>,<jstreete@Dal.Ca>,

<darl@Dal.Ca>,<jthompso@Dal.Ca>,<tetro@Dal.Ca>,<mistone@Dal.Ca>,<afstewar@Dal.Ca>,

<tross@Dal.Ca>,<ngrobert@Dal.Ca>,<kenneth.paradis@Dal.Ca>,<hmeek@Dal.Ca>,

<dmcneil@Dal.Ca>,<dmatthia@Dal.Ca>,<ann.martin@Dal.Ca>,<rmaitzen@Dal.Ca>,

<t.macgregor@Dal.Ca>,<sluo@Dal.Ca>,<luckyj@Dal.Ca>,<rleitch@Dal.Ca>,

<sean.lawrence@Dal.Ca>,<dean.irvine@Dal.Ca>,<rhuebert@Dal.Ca>,

<jason.haslam@Dal.Ca>,<greenfld@Dal.Ca>,<mfurrow@Dal.Ca>,<dhevans@Dal.Ca>,

<IV610512@Dal.Ca>,<diepev@Dal.Ca>,<cvdawson@Dal.Ca>,<lchoyce@Dal.Ca>,

<abrittan@Dal.Ca>,<lyn.bennett@Dal.Ca>,<jbaxter@Dal.Ca>,

delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=1313011,

relay=imap.ucis.dal.ca. [129.173.1.98], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent

(j87GbVtP022718 Message accepted for delivery)







Entered on 09/19/2005 at 09:18:55 by Robert Callahan:





Aidan,







Can you attach the SMTP logs Chris is mentioning to this ticket so I 
can see what is happening here?







Thanks,



Rob





Entered on 09/16/2005 at 23:47:51 by Christopher Wright:

**An update was made to this Ticket based on an update made through 
email to dynamically-linked Ticket #19184 in Project Computer Centre 
Help Desk**





Check with Aidan in N&S for SMTP logs.



1) The text of the ticket with Julia Wright is included in my ticket.

It has the text of one of the messages she did not receive (that had

been forwarded to her). Her address is clearly included in the "To"

header. I linked the ticket to N&S and Aidan replied her address

was not included in the TO list given to the SMTP server by WebMail.

His response is in the ticket. He forwarded the problem to Admin

(ticket ISSUE=7448 PROJ=2).



Julia's address is the last in the "To" list, but is followed by CC's.

Aidan didn't indicate if Julia was the only intended recipient who

didn't receive the message.



2) The error message Andrew Wainwright received and bounced to me is

also included in my ticket together with the original message (that

was incorporated in the error message). I spoke to Bruce N&S and he

consulted Aidan. Bruce gave me a hard copy (somewhat reformated for

printing) of the SMTP log that omit one of the 10 addressees.

The SMTP addresses include a null address that produced the error

message.



I find it interesting that the omitted address was not the last, but

the 7th of the 9 cc's following 1 To address. Bruce pointed out the

strange inclusion of "for <darl@dal.ca>" in the Received header of the

original message. That is not one of the recipients (unless it was

a Bcc, but when I talked to Andrew he said 10 recipients which is the

count of the To and Cc recipients).



The headers for Andrew's original message are already in the ticket.

I asked Andrew bounce the original message to me, but the Received

headers in the message I received are from him to me -- only the

original "From" header seems to have been preserved.



Chris



On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:11 AM, Computer Centre Help Desk wrote:
Entered on 09/16/2005 at 09:11:04 by Robert Callahan:





Chris,







You say that the emails are being misaddressed. Can you provide me 
with where you are finding this out? IE Can you send me a copy of the 
email with the header or log? Providing this will help us better track 
the problem.







Thanks



Rob





Entered on 09/15/2005 at 16:58:01 by Christopher Wright:

**This Ticket is a copy of Ticket #19184 of project Computer Centre 
Help Desk**



I've had two problems recently with WebMail misaddressing outgoing e-mail.



The first was from julia.wright@dal.ca who has failed to receive several

department e-mail messages. She receives some, but not others.



The second, today, was from Andrew Wainwright who sent a message

to 10 people and received back a delivery "not deliverable to @ 
(unknown user)."

A check by system staff determined WebMail had misaddressed the message

resulting it being sent to 9 of the 10 addresses and an error in the remaining

address.



This is rather disturbing.



The outcome of my ticket about Julia's problem was that you (Admin) could not

find any report of the problem in the support lists or replicate the problem.

Since the problem has replicated, perhaps you could make a report of 
the problem.



------------------- Previous Ticket wrt julia.wright@dal.ca problem 
--------------



PreviousNext

Detail View - Ticket 18961

Title Fwd: A form-fillable travel claim form

Priority Normal

Status Closed

Submitter julia.wright@dal.ca

Assignee(s) Christopher Wright

CC(s) No CCs

Linked to

UCIS-NetSys - Ticket 73754

Unlink from Ticket 73754 of Project 5 Unlink



Description

Entered on 09/14/2005 at 14:28:58 by Christopher Wright:

Hi,



To summarize...



When an e-mail message is sent, there are two lists of addresses. A list that

appears in the mail message headers and a list that is used to deliver 
the message.



The message in question was sent from WebMail to a long list of addresses. You

appear as the last address in the list of addresses appearing in the 
mail message

headers. Our systems staff checked the mail server log and found you 
were not on the

list of addresses

used to deliver the message. That indicates a glitch in WebMail.



Our admin computing staff (who look after My.Dal/WebMail) say:



"No similar bugs have been reported on the vendors support from what 
we can see here.

We have also not been able to reproduce the problem. The best advice 
would be to

follow

the guidelines for creating a mailing list when dealing with a high 
number of email

addresses."



Setting up a department mailing list will

1) avoid this problem (not a fix, but a work around - which you need for now)

2) remove the long list of addresses from the mail message headers

3) be usable by more than one person (if desired)



To setup a mailing list, complete the form located at:

http://ucis.dal.ca/services/email/classmailinglistrequestform.html (or go to

http://www.dal.ca/email, select "Mailing Lists" and click on 
"Application Form").



If you (or rather your the person maintaining the department mailing 
list) would like

assistance setting up a mailing list on the list server, please let me know.



Entered on 09/07/2005 at 18:05:46 by ae:

**An update was made to this Ticket based on an update made through email to

dynamically-linked Ticket #73754 in Project UCIS-NetSys**



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There is no record in the mail log on the SMTP server (to which the

message was first transmitted on its way to IMAP) of Julia Wright's address

having been included as a recipient. This shows that there is not a

problem with the delivery of mail but with its sending.



A curious circumstance is that Julia Wright's address in the text of the

message is the last one in the "To:" list. This suggests that the mail

sending program left off that last address.



It appears from the message ID in the log messages that the sending

program is My Dal WebMail. I'd there foe guess there is a bug in that

program. I'm going to pass this ticket along to Admin. Computing who look

after WebMail.



Entered on 09/07/2005 at 15:46:58 by julia.wright@dal.ca:

I can at least discount b & c: my spam filter is set to send spam to my spam

folder, and it does that successfully, but the missing e-mails haven't been

delivered to the spam folder; my disk quota is at just 7.11% and this pdf file

is only about 100KB, so that can't be the problem.



Thanks for your help on this,

Julia



Quoting Computer Centre Help Desk <helpdesk@dal.ca>:
Entered on 09/07/2005 at 15:37:34 by Christopher Wright:

Copied to UCIS-NetSys as Ticket #73754 by Christopher Wright



Entered on 09/07/2005 at 15:37:14 by Christopher Wright:

I don't see any obvious reason for the message not to have been 
delivered to you.

Its curious that some messages arrive and not others.

That suggests

a) Different mailing address lists used to send the message (one with 
a problem)

However, I don't see a problem with this one.

b) Spam filtering. The long address list would score high on a spam filter.

However, mail sent from on campus doesn't go through the central spam filter

and you've checked your spam folder. How do you read your e-mail?

Do you use a program that has its own spam/junk-mail filter?

c) Disk quota. This message had a pdf attachment. If you are hovering on the

edge of your disk quota that could cause larger messages to be rejected.

However, the sender should receive a report saying the message was not

delivered.



I'm going to link this ticket to our systems staff to take a look at 
the problem.



As an aside, the long mail header could be avoided by creating a mailing list.

Information on the is found at http://www.dal.ca/email, by following 
the "Mailing

Lists" link. The direct link to the request form is:

http://ucis.dal.ca/services/email/mailinglistrequestform.html



Entered on 09/07/2005 at 14:00:09 by julia.wright@dal.ca:

Hello,

I'm forwarding you the attached because, for some reason, the original e-mail

did not reach me. This has happened a few times in the past couple of months,

always (as far as I know!) with e-mails from Carole Poirier addressed to the

whole department, like this one. I only found out about them via a colleague

who could then (as with this e-mail) forward it to me.

I've checked my filters etc., and there's nothing that would block this--and

I have my filters (spam and otherwise) set to put e-mails into my spam folder,

and these e-mails have not appeared in that folder.

If you could figure out why these e-mails aren't being delivered, that would

be a great help--I'm most concerned about what other e-mails might be going

missing. Could it be that the system just gives up after the 20th addressee or

something?

Thanks,

Julia



----- Forwarded message from Jason.Haslam@dal.ca -----

Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:43:13 -0300

From: Jason Haslam <Jason.Haslam@dal.ca>

Reply-To: Jason Haslam <Jason.Haslam@dal.ca>

Subject: Fwd: A form-fillable travel claim form

To: "Wright, Julia " <julia.wright@dal.ca>

---------------------------------------------

Click on the titles to see details:

By Jason Haslam:

Fitting

Sentences: Identity in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Prison

Narratives, a monograph forthcoming from the University of Toronto 
Press, 2005.



Edited by Jason Haslam and Julia M. Wright:

Captivating

Subjects: Writing Confinement, Citizenship, and Nationhood in the

Nineteenth Century, a collection of critical essays available now

(University of Toronto Press, 2005).

--------------------------------------------

Dr. Jason Haslam

Assistant Professor

Department of English

Dalhousie University

6135 University Ave.

Halifax, Nova Scotia

B3H 4P9

http://myweb.dal.ca/~js592681



----- End forwarded message -----



____________________________________

Julia M. Wright

Canada Research Chair in European Studies

Department of English

Dalhousie University

6135 University Ave.

Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4P9

homepage: http://myweb.dal.ca/jl441155 19th-c. Irish Literature:

http://irish-literature.english.dal.ca



Contact Information

Email address julia.wright@dal.ca



Ticket Information

Via Email



Attached Files

Filename Size Date

travel-form.fillable1.pdf 98 KB Sep 7 14:00:08 Download



------------------------ Headers of message sent by Andrew Wainwright 
-------------



Return-Path: <Andrew.Wainwright@Dal.Ca>

Received: (from apache@localhost)

by KIL-UPT-3.UCIS.Dal.Ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j8FIkdKw020155;

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

Received: from AWainwright.English.Dal.Ca (AWainwright.English.Dal.Ca

[129.173.64.115]) by my3.dal.ca (Horde MIME library) with HTTP for

<darl@dal.ca>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

Message-ID: <20050915154639.g2w4jyvgjs8w40ss@my3.dal.ca>

Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

From: JA Wainwright <Andrew.Wainwright@Dal.Ca>

To: acompton@unbsj.ca

Cc: paulmilton@telus.net, tremblay@stthomasu.ca, creelman@unbsj.ca,

afurlong@upei.ca, alan.young@acadiau.ca, cnicholson@ed.ac.uk,

fuller@hhs.bham.ac.uk, john.baxter@Dal.Ca, carrie.dawson@Dal.Ca

Subject: Literary Atlas

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Disposition: inline

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)



--------------------- Error Message recived by Andrew.Wainwright 
----------------------



Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300 [15:46:39 ADT]

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@KIL-UPT-3.UCIS.Dal.Ca>Add 
to Address

book (MAILER-DAEMON@KIL-UPT-3.UCIS.Dal.Ca) Canada

To: Andrew.Wainwright@dal.caAdd to Address book (Andrew.Wainwright@dal.ca)

Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details

Part(s): Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

Headers: Show All Headers

Error

ERROR: Your message could not be delivered.

The mail server generated the following error message:



The original message was received at Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:46:39 -0300

from apache@localhost



----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----

@

(reason: 550 5.1.1 User unknown)



----- Transcript of session follows -----

550 5.1.1 @... User unknown



Info

Additional message error details can be viewed HERE.

The text of the returned message can be viewed HERE.



---------------------------





The following fields were incompatible with this project's schema:

Field: Via (Project field not present)

Original Data: Phone

Field: Phone (Address Book field not present)

Original Data: 494-2644