Summary | Check for children if building imap tree |
Queue | IMP |
Queue Version | HEAD |
Type | Bug |
State | Resolved |
Priority | 1. Low |
Owners | slusarz (at) horde (dot) org |
Requester | jan (at) horde (dot) org |
Created | 03/09/2005 (7503 days ago) |
Due | |
Updated | 03/31/2005 (7481 days ago) |
Assigned | 03/29/2005 (7483 days ago) |
Resolved | 03/31/2005 (7481 days ago) |
Github Issue Link | |
Github Pull Request | |
Milestone | |
Patch | No |
State ⇒ Resolved
State ⇒ Feedback
subscribed and unsubscribed) folders. There is no way to check for
the existence of (possible) children if doing a subscribed only view
without explicitly doing a all folders check under that node, which is
exactly what we are trying to avoid in the first place - namely,
accessing any levels of the IMAP Tree we do not expressly need to
depending on the user's current view.
State ⇒ Assigned
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
Type ⇒ Bug
Summary ⇒ Check for children if building imap tree
Queue ⇒ IMP
Assigned to Michael Slusarz
isOpen() we should not only check for in the nav_polled preference if
a folder is expanded, but also if the folder has children.
I have an obviously broken nav_polled array that markes a folder as
open even though it doesn't have any children. This might happen for
example if deleting subfolders of expanded folders with a different
mail client.