6.0.0-beta1
7/6/25

[#7094] Whitelist/Blacklist per domain
Summary Whitelist/Blacklist per domain
Queue Ingo
Queue Version 1.2
Type Enhancement
State Rejected
Priority 2. Medium
Owners
Requester mrjb (at) gmail (dot) com
Created 07/22/2008 (6193 days ago)
Due
Updated 07/24/2008 (6191 days ago)
Assigned
Resolved 07/23/2008 (6192 days ago)
Milestone
Patch No

History
07/24/2008 01:12:17 AM mrjhb3 (at) gmai (dot) com Comment #4 Reply to this comment
This has been explained a few times already, and unless there are any
new arguments this is not going to happen.
Thanks for the consideration.



We'll just move on and begin our rollout of either thunderbird or OL 
2007, since we do own it, so that we can gain this functionality back.




07/23/2008 03:46:22 PM Jan Schneider Comment #3
State ⇒ Rejected
Reply to this comment
This has been explained a few times already, and unless there are any 
new arguments this is not going to happen.
07/23/2008 01:08:51 AM mrjhb3 (at) gmail (dot) com Comment #2 Reply to this comment
Put in wrong email address, updating so I can see what the horde 
developers response is.
07/22/2008 02:55:16 PM mrjb (at) gmail (dot) com Comment #1
Priority ⇒ 2. Medium
Patch ⇒ No
Milestone ⇒
Queue ⇒ Ingo
Summary ⇒ Whitelist/Blacklist per domain
Type ⇒ Enhancement
State ⇒ New
Reply to this comment
Please consider adding back the ability to whitelist and blacklist 
email based on  domain.  With the latest release you can only WL/BL on 
a per user basis.  If you want to block a domain, you have to create a 
filter to do this.  This is a pain for most users that were used to 
using the WL/BL function.



The main reason for asking for this functionality is MS Outlook has 
this feature albeit via the junkmail settings and users are accustomed 
to using it.  With the junkmail settings you can block an individual 
or a domain.



I'd like to continue having users use the webmail based products, but 
this lost functionality in ingo, has people seriously considering OL 
or some other front-end to use for webmail that I'd rather not have.



Thanks for the consideration,



mrjb

Saved Queries