Summary | DIMP should honor Horde's sidebar_width preference |
Queue | DIMP |
Queue Version | 1.0 |
Type | Enhancement |
State | Resolved |
Priority | 2. Medium |
Owners | jan (at) horde (dot) org, slusarz (at) horde (dot) org |
Requester | rsalmon (at) mbpgroup (dot) com |
Created | 05/30/2008 (6245 days ago) |
Due | |
Updated | 07/15/2008 (6199 days ago) |
Assigned | |
Resolved | 07/15/2008 (6199 days ago) |
Milestone | 1.0.1 |
Patch | No |
State ⇒ Resolved
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.69.2.41&r2=1.69.2.42&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/DimpBase.js?r1=1.1.2.76&r2=1.1.2.77&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/src/DimpBase.js?r1=1.1.2.76&r2=1.1.2.77&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/ie6_or_less.css?r1=1.20.2.13&r2=1.20.2.14&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.115&r2=1.116&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/DimpBase.js?r1=1.115&r2=1.116&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/src/DimpBase.js?r1=1.113&r2=1.114&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/ie6_or_less.css?r1=1.34&r2=1.35&ty=u
so if they want it huge, they have to deal with the consequences.
browsers. IIRC the problem is that IE 6 doesn't support min-width so
our workaround needs to be adjusted to take into account the
sidebar_width value.
if they want it huge, they have to deal with the consequences.
State ⇒ Accepted
a certain point causes a horizontal scroll in the browser window.
State ⇒ Resolved
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/print.css?r1=1.23&r2=1.24&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/print.css?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/print.css?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&ty=u
for me in IE anyway at the moment, so I'm not sure if this is related.
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/print.css?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/print.css?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&ty=u
the value of 'left' set in print.css when we are printing the message
- thus we get printed messages with a 'sidebar_width' amount of
whitespace at the left of the printed message.
This is becoming more trouble than it is worth. I think that we need
to back this out. Doing this via CSS just doesn't seem to be viable
at the present time.
declaration that prevents overflow from causing horizontal scrolling
- this needs to be changed depending on the sidebar width. And IE6
will automatically expand the sidebar for large folders, which causes
the sidebar to overlap the message list.
- firefox 2.0.0.14 (win/linux)
- IE 6.0.2900.2180 on win XP
- IE 6.0.2800.1106 on win 2k
but it doesn't work with IE 6.0.3790.3959 on win2k3 SP2. In fact
nothing works. Connecting to DIMP gives me a blank screen
('Loading...'), and connecting to horde, I don't even get the side
panel.
State ⇒ Accepted
Priority ⇒ 2. Medium
Milestone ⇒ 1.0.1
Assigned to Jan Schneider
declaration that prevents overflow from causing horizontal scrolling -
this needs to be changed depending on the sidebar width. And IE6 will
automatically expand the sidebar for large folders, which causes the
sidebar to overlap the message list.
preference. With Horde's sidebar, there are usually two icon columns
left of the folder names, due to the tree structure. This is 32
pixels of screen estate.
Horde (150) is *less* than the width in DIMP (160).
more space right of the folders in DIMP because of the two icon columns.
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.69.2.29&r2=1.69.2.30&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/index.php?r1=1.59.2.6&r2=1.59.2.7&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/DimpBase.js?r1=1.1.2.50&r2=1.1.2.51&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/src/DimpBase.js?r1=1.1.2.50&r2=1.1.2.51&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/lib/DIMP.php?r1=1.110.2.19&r2=1.110.2.20&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/templates/index/index.inc?r1=1.152.2.39&r2=1.152.2.40&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/screen.css?r1=1.221.2.34&r2=1.221.2.35&ty=u
State ⇒ Resolved
"Computer Associates" -> "Computer%20Associates"
"testé" -> "test%26AOk-"
style in index.inc per PHP? With the current implementation, the
sidebar "jumps" from the default width to the user-selected width.
changed to do this.
preference. With Horde's sidebar, there are usually two icon columns
left of the folder names, due to the tree structure. This is 32
pixels of screen estate.
Horde (150) is *less* than the width in DIMP (160).
wrong attribute name) so now the full folder name will appear on a
mouseover. I've gone ahead and added some code to honor Horde's
sidebar_width pref in DIMP by dynamically setting widths/positions of
various elements. Please test with various browsers to make sure
this works properly.
"Computer Associates" -> "Computer%20Associates"
"testé" -> "test%26AOk-"
style in index.inc per PHP? With the current implementation, the
sidebar "jumps" from the default width to the user-selected width.
We should also consider setting the width smaller then the user
preference. With Horde's sidebar, there are usually two icon columns
left of the folder names, due to the tree structure. This is 32 pixels
of screen estate.
Assigned to Michael Slusarz
State ⇒ Accepted
Summary ⇒ DIMP should honor Horde's sidebar_width preference
wrong attribute name) so now the full folder name will appear on a
mouseover. I've gone ahead and added some code to honor Horde's
sidebar_width pref in DIMP by dynamically setting widths/positions of
various elements. Please test with various browsers to make sure this
works properly.
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.97&r2=1.98&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/index.php?r1=1.65&r2=1.66&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/DimpBase.js?r1=1.74&r2=1.75&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/js/src/DimpBase.js?r1=1.74&r2=1.75&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/lib/DIMP.php?r1=1.131&r2=1.132&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/templates/index/index.inc?r1=1.192&r2=1.193&ty=u
http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/dimp/themes/screen.css?r1=1.257&r2=1.258&ty=u
noresize="noresize" ?
element?) the same way as it is working for the div element
previewPane (or may be it is splitBar) ?
customize the size of their sidebar?
noresize="noresize" ?
dragging, if I'm not wrong.
sidebar which makes sense when they use long folder names and if the
depth of their folder tree is big, eg
folder a
+-- folder b
+-- folder c
+-- folder d
...
Is it possible to allow the frame to be resize dynamically: removing
noresize="noresize" ?
big tree) instead of having a horizontal scroll bar at the bottom of
the sidebar ?
folder is too large, the excess should run off the end of the sideabr
(overflow: hidden in CSS terms)
tired when I check that. Sorry.
tooltip/mouseover title for long mailbox names should suffice.
are going to kill their screen layout if they have very long folder
names. A tooltip would great.
folder's full name in the sidebar and the tooltip doesn't show the
full name ether, then is there a point in having a tooltip?
The mouseover thing sounds good, but will it work when doing drag&drop emails?
width which is the width of the frame. It would require javascript
to dynamically change the size of the sidebar in DIMP. Other devs:
do we want to use sidebar_width pref to do this?
sense to use the preference, for more consistency with the "normal"
Horde layout, and more flexibility to users' demands.
are going to kill their screen layout if they have very long folder
names. A tooltip would great.
State ⇒ Feedback
width which is the width of the frame. It would require javascript to
dynamically change the size of the sidebar in DIMP. Other devs: do we
want to use sidebar_width pref to do this?
big tree) instead of having a horizontal scroll bar at the bottom of
the sidebar ?
folder is too large, the excess should run off the end of the sideabr
(overflow: hidden in CSS terms)
#2- I don't think we should be expanding the sidebar. I think atooltip/mouseover title for long mailbox names should suffice.
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
State ⇒ New
Patch ⇒ No
Milestone ⇒
Summary ⇒ sidebar_width
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Queue ⇒ DIMP
- DIMP sidebar uses the global pref sidebar_width?
- DIMP's sidebar auto increses its width (folders with long names or
big tree) instead of having a horizontal scroll bar at the bottom of
the sidebar ?
thanks.