| Summary | Freebusy on another server than Horde/Kolab |
| Queue | Kolab |
| Type | Enhancement |
| State | Assigned |
| Priority | 1. Low |
| Owners | Gunnar Wrobel <p (at) rdus (dot) de> |
| Requester | noethen (at) uni-paderborn (dot) de |
| Created | 05/14/2008 (51 days ago) |
| Due | |
| Updated | 06/30/2008 (4 days ago) |
| Assigned | 06/30/2008 (4 days ago) |
| Resolved | |
| Attachments | kronolith_storage.path.diff.TXT ![]() |
| Milestone | |
| Patch | No |
Gunnar, I'll move this one to you as you are currently working on the code.
New Attachment: kronolith_storage.path.diff.TXT
no, performance problems is not the reason why we separated kolab and
freebusy. Most of all it is becaus of existing infrastructure
(mail/web).
Attached is my litte patch.
Greetings
Heiko
thanks for your report. Gunnar is currently restructuring the backend
code to make it more modular. As you patched the kronolith driver,
would you mind sending your patch file?
I can only speculate why you separated the servers in the first place,
but I guess it will be solved once this new code is integrated into Kolab:
https://www.intevation.de/roundup/kolab/issue2554
Cheers,
Thomas
thanks for your report. Gunnar is currently restructuring the backend
code to make it more modular. As you patched the kronolith driver,
would you mind sending your patch file?
I can only speculate why you separated the servers in the first place,
but I guess it will be solved once this new code is integrated into Kolab:
https://www.intevation.de/roundup/kolab/issue2554
Cheers,
Thomas
Assigned to Gunnar Wrobel
Queue ⇒ Kolab
Patch ⇒
Milestone ⇒
Queue ⇒ Kronolith
Summary ⇒ Freebusy on another server than Horde/Kolab
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
State ⇒ New
servers. So we patched horde/kronolith/lib/Storage/kolab.php -> class
Kronolith_Storage_kolab extends Kronolith_Storage
in order to define a different kolab freebusy-server.
Would be nice if there would be a config option for that like
['kolab']['freebusy']['server'];
Greetings
Heiko Nöthen