Summary | Allow external queue providers as plugins |
Queue | Whups |
Queue Version | Git master |
Type | Enhancement |
State | Rejected |
Priority | 1. Low |
Owners | |
Requester | ralf.lang (at) ralf-lang (dot) de |
Created | 01/16/2012 (4918 days ago) |
Due | |
Updated | 01/30/2013 (4538 days ago) |
Assigned | |
Resolved | 01/30/2013 (4538 days ago) |
Milestone | |
Patch | No |
external queues?
happened to their existing queues.
necessarily mean that both queue providers are really used.
I'm not against this, but this is quite some work, that only makes
sense if it's actually used by more than one user.
*and* external queues?
happened to their existing queues.
State ⇒ Feedback
external queues?
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Summary ⇒ Allow external queue providers as plugins
Queue ⇒ Whups
Milestone ⇒
Patch ⇒ No
State ⇒ New
external providers like sesha. We cannot have a combination of both
though.
Proposal:
Allow for external providers to register API functions like
'tickets/providers/queues/$app'
'tickets/providers/versions/$app'
and loop through queues and versions exposed by the API