6.0.0
7/2/26

[#7082] Bulk header
Summary Bulk header
Queue Whups
Queue Version HEAD
Type Enhancement
State Resolved
Priority 2. Medium
Owners jan (at) horde (dot) org
Requester selsky (at) columbia (dot) edu
Created 7/18/08 (6558 days ago)
Due
Updated 8/25/08 (6520 days ago)
Assigned 7/18/08 (6558 days ago)
Resolved 8/25/08 (6520 days ago)
Milestone 1
Patch No

History
352 Jan Schneider Comment #6
State ⇒ Resolved
Reply to this comment
Added
271 armijn (at) uulug (dot) nl Comment #4 Reply to this comment

[Show Quoted Text - 9 lines]
I have. Newer versions of the vacation program definitely do use it. 
An increasing number of applications are filtering on these headers, 
for example Exim:



http://wiki.exim.org/EximAutoReply


4212 Jan Schneider Comment #3 Reply to this comment
What about RFC 3834? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3834

Section 5 of that RFC talks about the Auto-Submitted header, which is
what you actually would like to add to every mail that Horde sends
automatically. Please add it to Horde, it would make a lot of mail
admins a lot happier :-)
Is anybody actually using this header? I have never heard of it or 
seen it in the wild before.
1310 armijn (at) uulug (dot) nl Comment #2 Reply to this comment
What about RFC 3834? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3834



Section 5 of that RFC talks about the Auto-Submitted header, which is 
what you actually would like to add to every mail that Horde sends 
automatically. Please add it to Horde, it would make a lot of mail 
admins a lot happier :-)
359 Jan Schneider Milestone ⇒ 1
Priority ⇒ 2. Medium
State ⇒ Assigned
Assigned to Jan Schneider
 
95 Matt Selsky Comment #1
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Summary ⇒ Bulk header
Queue ⇒ Whups
Milestone ⇒
Patch ⇒ No
State ⇒ New
Reply to this comment
Please add a "Precedence: bulk" header to the mail that whups 
generates.  Otherwise my vacation program will try to respond to it :-)


Saved Queries