Tickets :: Comment on [#6972] mailbox listing speed-up (IMAP

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: . . __ . ..__.. . \|__\|/ `\|\ \|\| \|\| \| \| \|\__.\| \\|\|__\|\|/\\|
Comment	>> I'm not actually too worried about that, though that would be nice - > >> what's more curious is that I don't use subscriptions (they're turned > >> off in my prefs) and IMP started to use them. > > > > I don't see the subscriptions issue with the latest version - maybe > it was fixed in the last few days. > > > > As for the other issue, dovecot is exhibiting correct behavior. From > RFC 3501 [6.3.9]: > > > > The returned untagged LSUB response MAY contain different mailbox > > flags from a LIST untagged response. If this should happen, the > > flags in the untagged LIST are considered more authoritative. > > > > ... > > > > The server MUST NOT unilaterally remove an existing mailbox name > > from the subscription list even if a mailbox by that name no > > longer exists. > > > > So if viewing only subscribed folders, we do need to cross-reference > with imap_list() results to get an accurate representation of the > current subscribed folders.
Attachment
Watch this ticket