Tickets :: Comment on [#13495] "Reply state" not synched over devices

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: . .___.__ . .. . \| [__ [__)\|_/ \|__\| \|___[___\| \\| \\| \|
Comment	>>>> This is because OL doesn't send "SMART" replies or forwards, so it's >>>> not obvious it's a reply. We can sniff out the In-Reply-To header >>>> though. >>> >>> ..and again it's some Outlook "magic".. >>> >>> As quoted from Microsoft since EAS 14.0 it is implemented in every >>> their software, but it is NOT . >> >> This one isn't really a fault. The specs don't state that a SMART >> request MUST be used, only that it CAN be used to save bandwidth. The >> SMART request saves bandwidth at the expense of server load (since >> the original IMAP message must be fetched from the IMAP server and >> parsed). >> > > Agree, but they should try smartreply and smarforward as default.. > Well we can't do anything. > >> After looking at this further, though, it's not going to be possible >> to work around this since we have NO way of knowing if it's a reply >> vs a forward, nor do we know the original UID of the original IMAP >> message, or even what folder it's from (so we can't efficiently look >> it up). > > I'm not really understanding what you mean.. > > Think about this test-scenario: > > 1. I get a message from lets say "client@gmail.com" > -> message-header: > ------------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- > Message-ID: > <CACQS2qqQrAa2QMi=pHRB4Rgn8XZtAhuqCq99LvT-Kp4SbU4LNQ@mail.gmail.com> > ------------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- > > 2. I reply to this message from OL2013: > -> message-header(s): > ------------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- > References: > <CACQS2qqQrAa2QMi=pHRB4Rgn8XZtAhuqCq99LvT-Kp4SbU4LNQ@mail.gmail.com> > In-Reply-To: > <CACQS2qqQrAa2QMi=pHRB4Rgn8XZtAhuqCq99LvT-Kp4SbU4LNQ@mail.gmail.com> > ------------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- > > 3. I forward this message from OL2013: > ------------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- > References: > <CACQS2qqQrAa2QMi=pHRB4Rgn8XZtAhuqCq99LvT-Kp4SbU4LNQ@mail.gmail.com> > In-Reply-To: > <CACQS2qqQrAa2QMi=pHRB4Rgn8XZtAhuqCq99LvT-Kp4SbU4LNQ@mail.gmail.com> > ------------8<---------------------------------------------------------------- > > ..so the problems in coding would be: > 1. saving the original "Message-ID" vs. "UID" > 2. finding a possibility to distinguish if it's a REPLY or FORWARD > (parsing the Subject is not OK since it could be changed) > > Am I supposing this right?
Attachment
Watch this ticket

Saved Queries