Tickets :: Comment on [#10416] [ActiveSync] Error when syncing recurring events

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: __..__ .___.___..__. (__ [ __[__ _/ [__] .__)[_./\| ./__.\| \|
Comment	> >> I have only problems with them on my DesireHD. I tested with an >> iphone and it works out of the box. In the ActiveSync properties of >> the device i have the following Entry: >> Programm:Android-EAS/3.10.000.037285.405. >> >> When i apply the patch to send the dayofmonth and monthofyear for the >> monthly and yearly events, they occur in the calendar. It seems that >> the sync on the DesireHD just throws the events away when these >> properties are not set. > > If you are talking about recurrence_month_date events, then your > client is broken. These properties make no sense with this recurrence > type. For the recurrence_month_day type, they are already sent. > >> The notes/changes section of the reference also does not mention that >> this fields are not supported on older revisions of active sync like >> for CalendarType. > Yes, it does. I'm on my mobile right now so I can't give a link, but > it's there. > >> So i think they should be sent. > Impossible, it's not defined in any of the wbxml codepages/schema for EAS 2.5 > > I don't have a >> proof for it but that it works for me when they are sent. Can also be >> a buggy implementation of the sync for the DesireHD > > > Yes. If your client requires this for EAS 2.5 then it's broken, or > doesn't support 2.5. > >> I do not know a case where it fails. My problem is that the reference >> does not exactly define the week of the month. You can on the one >> hand say the first week are the first seven days. You can also define >> the first week as the first monday to sunday. So if the month starts >> on a friday only the first three days are the first week. Just a >> matter of definition. It seems to work so it does not need to be >> changed. > > In this context, It's the first week with any days in the month. > Nothing else would make sense since the recurrence types that use > this recur on e.g., the first tuesady of the month. Any other > definition would potentially miss days in the first week. >>> AFAIK, this type is for the same _date_, not the dayofyear. >> >> If we can not create such an event on outlook then we do not need to >> sync it. The only problem for me is that you can create an event on >> the web client that will never show up on the sync clients. Is there >> an easy way to remove this type of event or to prevent the users to >> create such an event? > > Not without hacking the kronolith code. I agree it's a potential > issue, but don't think we shuld limit our feature set based on a > limited sync protocol.
Attachment
Watch this ticket

Saved Queries