Tickets :: Comment on [#5974] Inconsistent vacation excludes

Search Results: 78 of 574 [ <<First <Prev Next> Last>> ] [ Return to Search Results ]

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: .__ . ,.__ .__ \ / [__) \./ \| \[__) >< [__) \| \|__/[__)/ \
Comment	>> I'm against using the Spam header because different spam filters use > >> different headers and with Ingo it's really easy to have a spam > >> filter rule before the vacation rule, so this is redundant. In the > >> worst case it even applies a different spam rule than what the user > >> usually does. > > > > I think using the spam header would do more good than harm? Perhaps > in the mean time there could be a warning that the vacation will go > to all lists and spam and a suggestion to create and enable a spam > rule and move it before the vacation rule? I know I would have > appreciated that information. I already have settings in sam and in > a global .mailfilter but vacation replies were still sent to spam > which I did not expect. > > > > If the spam rule should be "before" the vacation rule then why not > make that the default? Thanks.
Attachment
Watch this ticket