<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://dev.horde.org/themes/horde//default/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?> 
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> 
 <channel> 
  <title>Support html tags in comments</title> 
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 02:41:22 +0000</pubDate> 
  <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930</link> 
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="Support html tags in comments" href="https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930/rss" /> 
  <description>Support html tags in comments</description> 
 
   
   
  <item> 
   <title>It would be awesome if Ansel supported html tags in picture&#039;</title> 
   <description>It would be awesome if Ansel supported html tags in picture&#039;s comments.

Maybe not all tags for security reasons, but some interesting tags that I would use would be: A and IMG.

BTW, I do know links are detected and converted to appropriate html, this is still not enough in my opinion.
</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:01:45 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930#t58283</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>The comment functionality is provided by the Agora applicati</title> 
   <description>The comment functionality is provided by the Agora application.

Personally, I&#039;d be inclined to reject this, but will wait for other devs to weigh in.</description> 
   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:50:13 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930#t58289</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>I agree. Allowing HTML is really only useful for a very smal</title> 
   <description>I agree. Allowing HTML is really only useful for a very small number of users. We could add text filters for simple markup though.</description> 
   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:58:13 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930#t58294</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>Maybe I wasn&#039;t clear, I was not talking about the comments p</title> 
   <description>Maybe I wasn&#039;t clear, I was not talking about the comments provided by Agora, but the captions/descriptions that Ansel already handles itself.

Maybe instead of full-fledged html it would be easier to use BBcode, or a subset of BBcode.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBCode

There are some smiley faces are already part of horde&#039;s images, so maybe we can reuse them.</description> 
   <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:44:11 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930#t58299</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>Ok, well, in that case, I&#039;m going to have to reject this. I </title> 
   <description>Ok, well, in that case, I&#039;m going to have to reject this. I don&#039;t see this being worth the added resources that would be required for parsing the captions on each view.</description> 
   <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:51:20 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930#t58301</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>Well, if the resource usage is a concern, this could be opti</title> 
   <description>Well, if the resource usage is a concern, this could be optional (I&#039;m thinking of a global settings option, not a per-user preference).
So if its disabled, there would be no parsing at all and it would work just like it does now.</description> 
   <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:05:42 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/8930#t58302</link> 
  </item> 
   
   
 
 </channel> 
</rss> 
