Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:37:19 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7611 maildrop destination rules destination rules like 'To,Cc,Bcc,Resent-to', 'To,Cc,' don't work the attached path should fix this. the same fix should work for procmail : ticket #7117 Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:10:44 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7611#t50182 Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/ingo/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.206&r2=1.207&ty=u http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/ingo/lib/Script/maildrop.php?r1=1.23&r2=1.24&ty=u http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/ingo/lib/Script/procmail.php?r1=1.99&r2=1.100&ty=u Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:28:07 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7611#t50438 Committed, thanks! Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:28:29 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7611#t50439 While this is a highly unlikely case, this change breaks numerical comparisons for any multi-field conditions. Since numerical comparisons use a numbered subgroup to get the number into a maildrop variable, adding another (capturing) group for the header fields shifts the number to 2 (i.e. $MATCH2 instead of $MATCH1) and thus breaks the comparison (because the value would be compared to the field name instead of the value). This is easily fixed by using a non-capturing group for the header fields: "(?:" instead of "(" Since the maildrop driver requires maildrop >= 2.0 anyway, we can use this PCRE feature. I just confirmed this on maildrop 2.0.4 Mon, 25 May 2009 00:53:10 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7611#t54292