<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://dev.horde.org/themes/horde//default/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?> 
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> 
 <channel> 
  <title>&quot;No such object&quot; after ldap_rename</title> 
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:50:56 +0000</pubDate> 
  <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7356</link> 
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="&quot;No such object&quot; after ldap_rename" href="https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7356/rss" /> 
  <description>&quot;No such object&quot; after ldap_rename</description> 
 
   
   
  <item> 
   <title>in case an LDAP object has to be renamed (cn attribute is ed</title> 
   <description>in case an LDAP object has to be renamed (cn attribute is edited and changed in turba&#039;s contact.php, cn makes up the object&#039;s RDN), it will not be reloaded after saving.



instead of the modified object the address book list is loaded. somehow the new $object_id is not passed back to the reloaded contact.php...



sorry, no patch so far, but i will look at that later...</description> 
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7356#t49000</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>Yes, line 86 to 87 in turba/edit.php says:



    $url = Uti</title> 
   <description>Yes, line 86 to 87 in turba/edit.php says:



    $url = Util::getFormData(&#039;url&#039;);

    header(&#039;Location: &#039; . (empty($url) ? $contact-&gt;url(&#039;Contact&#039;, true) : $url));



And $url will be set to the old contact id. If we can safely assume that we *always* want to return to the contact view after editing we could modify the above snippet to



    header(&#039;Location: &#039; . $contact-&gt;url(&#039;Contact&#039;, true));



@Chuck, Jan: Is that the intended way of operation?</description> 
   <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:48:20 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7356#t51472</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>&gt; @Chuck, Jan: Is that the intended way of operation?



No,</title> 
   <description>&gt; @Chuck, Jan: Is that the intended way of operation?



No, because you can also edit contacts from the browse views, and you don&#039;t want to &quot;return&quot; to the contact view in those cases.</description> 
   <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:09:26 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7356#t51478</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>The save code should update the properties in the $contact o</title> 
   <description>The save code should update the properties in the $contact object.</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:43:06 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7356#t51496</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>As far as I know the save code updates the contact propertie</title> 
   <description>As far as I know the save code updates the contact properties. It is just the edit page that prefers the old url over the contact properties.</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7356#t51506</link> 
  </item> 
   
   
 
 </channel> 
</rss> 
