Time period - vacation error

Hi! If you set up a starting an ending time in the prebui

Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:44:11 +0000

Hi! If you set up a starting an ending time in the prebuild vacation rule of ingo then you got the following error message in the procmail.log (and no vacation answer mail of course) /bin/sh: line 0: [: 1177587873-gt: unary operator expected procmail: Error while writing to " /bin/sh -c 'if [ $DATE-gt $START ]; then if [ $END -gt $DATE ]; then true; else false;fi;fi; I am using the latest RC Versions of Horde, Imp and Ingo on a Suse 10.1 Linux (Kernel 2.6.16.54-0.2.5) Package Versions Procmail 3.22-56 postfix 2.2.9-10 courier-imap 4.1.2-47.1 php 5.1.2-29.50 apache 2.2.6-4.2 mysql 5.0.26-12.16

Are you sure you are using 1.2-RC2? Because this has been fi

Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:06:53 +0000

Are you sure you are using 1.2-RC2? Because this has been fixed in RC2.

> Are you sure you are using 1.2-RC2? Because this has been

Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:37:17 +0000

> Are you sure you are using 1.2-RC2? Because this has been fixed in RC2. Thats what the horde configuration page says: Filter (ingo) H3 (1.2-RC2) I'll try to install a full version of ingo (I used the patch)- I did had troubles with paching dimp too, if I use the "full" version it worked. I'll report afterwards lg lg

Hi Jan, I installed ingo from scratch - without any advan

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:23:50 +0000

Hi Jan, I installed ingo from scratch - without any advancments (see procmail.log). Additionally the sender gets a mail returned with: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=bar.rk-lilienfeld.at type=AAAA: Host not found --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maybe there is missing a package or something on Suse? procmail.log --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Folder: /home/office/Maildir//.SPAM/new/1206436443.4314_0.linux1 1821 procmail: Error while writing to " /bin/sh -c 'if [ $DATE -gt $START ]; then if [ $END -gt $DATE ]; then true; else false;fi;fi;'" Folder: /home/martin_hochreiter/Maildir/new/1206436500.4359_2.linux1 1782 procmail: Error while writing to " /bin/sh -c 'if [ $DATE -gt $START ]; then if [ $END -gt $DATE ]; then true; else false;fi;fi;'" procmail: Error while writing to " /bin/sh -c 'if [ $DATE -gt $START ]; then if [ $END -gt $DATE ]; then true; else false;fi;fi;'" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> I installed ingo from scratch - without any advancments (s

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:16:31 +0000

> I installed ingo from scratch - without any advancments (see procmail.log). That's not true, the error message that you reported is gone, as expected. > Additionally the sender gets a mail returned with: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > : Host or domain name not found. Name service error > for name=bar.rk-lilienfeld.at type=AAAA: Host not found > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This has nothing to do with Ingo, this is either a misconfigured mail server, or some invalid email address being used. > procmail.log > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Folder: /home/office/Maildir//.SPAM/new/1206436443.4314_0.linux1 > 1821 > procmail: Error while writing to " /bin/sh -c 'if [ $DATE -gt $START > ]; then if [ $END -gt $DATE ]; then true; else false;fi;fi;'" This error message is not very helpful because it doesn't say what exactly the error is. This still is not an Ingo issue, but probably a problem with your procmail setup. Try running that code manually and see what happens. For further help ask on the Ingo or Procmail mailing list.

Hi jan, So .. I am a little bit the man in the middle: T

Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:13:00 +0000

Hi jan, So .. I am a little bit the man in the middle: That's what I got from the procmail list to the code Ingo generates: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :0 Whc: vacation.lock | /bin/sh -c 'if [ $DATE -gt $START ]; then if [ $END -gt $DATE ]; then true; else false;fi;fi;' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This will never work... It should be: :0 Whc: vacation.lock * ? test $DATE -gt $START && test $END -gt $DATE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please try this patch: http://lists.horde.org/archives/cv

Sun, 04 May 2008 07:23:47 +0000

Please try this patch: http://lists.horde.org/archives/cvs/Week-of-Mon-20080428/077998.html

Hi Mat! Thank you for your work. I patched procmail.ph

Tue, 06 May 2008 12:02:47 +0000

Hi Mat! Thank you for your work. I patched procmail.php and it produces the file on the bottom but does not send an reply email (find the log also on the bottom) - BUT it generates a file named ":0" in my home directory - output you can find also at the bottom lg Martin .procmailrc ----------------------------------------------------- ##### Abwesenheit ##### :0 { FILEDATE=`test -f '.vacation.martin.hochreiter' && ls -lcn --time-style=+%s '.vacation.martin.hochreiter' | awk '{ print $6 + (172800) }'` DATE=`date +%s` DUMMY=`test -f '.vacation.martin.hochreiter' && test $FILEDATE -le $DATE && rm '.vacation.martin.hochreiter'` START=1210024800 END=1210111200 :0 Whc: vacation.lock * ? test $DATE -gt $START && test $END -gt $DATE :0 Whaf * ^TO_martin.hochreiter * !^X-Loop: martin.hochreiter * !^X-Spam-Flag: YES * !^From.*root@xxx.xx * !^From.*webmaster@xxx.xx * !^From.*log@xxx.xx, * !^FROM_DAEMON | formail -rD 8192 .vacation.martin.hochreiter :0 ehc | (formail -rI"Precedence: junk" \ -a"From: " \ -A"X-Loop: martin.hochreiter" \ -i"Subject: Urlaubsmeldung" \ -i"Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable" \ -i"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" ; \ ----------------------------------------------------- procmail log: -------------------------------------------------------------- procmail: Skipped "Whaf" procmail: Skipped "* ^TO_martin.hochreiter" procmail: Skipped "* !^X-Loop: martin.hochreiter" procmail: Skipped "* !^X-Spam-Flag: YES" procmail: Skipped "* !^From.*root@xxx.xx" procmail: Skipped "* !^From.*webmaster@xxx.xx" procmail: Skipped "* !^From.*log@xxx.xx," procmail: Skipped "* !^FROM_DAEMON" procmail: Skipped "| formail -rD 8192 .vacation.martin.hochreiter" procmail: Skipped "Whaf" procmail: Skipped "* ^TO_martin_hochreiter" procmail: Skipped "* !^X-Loop: martin_hochreiter" procmail: Skipped "* !^X-Spam-Flag: YES" procmail: Skipped "* !^From.*root@xxx.xx" procmail: Skipped "* !^From.*webmaster@xxx.xx" procmail: Skipped "* !^From.*log@xxx.xx," procmail: Skipped "* !^FROM_DAEMON" procmail: Skipped "| formail -rD 8192 .vacation.martin_hochreiter" From martin.hochreiter@yyy.yy Tue May 6 13:35:10 2008 Subject: test Folder: /home/martin_hochreiter/Maildir/new/1210073710.10309_2.linux 4155 -------------------------------------------------------------- produced file :0 : ------------------------------------------------------------------ From martin.hochreiter@yyy.yy Tue May 6 13:35:10 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: martin_hochreiter@mail.xxx.xx Delivered-To: martin_hochreiter@mail.xxx.xx Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.xxx.xx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B931B96FB for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:35:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.xxx.xx Received: from mail.xxx.xx ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.xxx.xx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DRGpnCaxqS5q for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from scalix.yyy.yy (scalix.yyy.yy [195.202.144.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.xxx.xx (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD44B96F5 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:35:06 +0200 (CEST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1210678495.59215@UHHnSw//utRH4988ysGNag Received: from scalix.yyy.yy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scalix.yyy.yy (8.13.6/8.13.6/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id m46BYtqa026770 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:34:55 +0200 Received: from [10.222.0.240] (fwint.yyy.yy [195.202.144.1]) by scalix.yyy.yy (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.3.0.11339) via ESMTP; Tue, 06 May 2008 13:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 13:34:23 +0200 From: Martin Hochreiter To: martin.hochreiter@xxx.xx Message-ID: <4820423F.3010008@yyy.yy> Subject: test x-scalix-Hops: 1 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070109070806060504000007" X-FH-StP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m46BYtqa026770 X-FH-StP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FH-StP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-104.264, required 3, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_50_60 0.13, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.00) X-FH-StP-MailScanner-From: martin.hochreiter@yyy.yy From martin.hochreiter@yyy.yy Tue May 6 13:35:10 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: martin_hochreiter@mail.xxx.xx Delivered-To: martin_hochreiter@mail.xxx.xx Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.xxx.xx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B931B96FB for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:35:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.xxx.xx Received: from mail.xxx.xx ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.xxx.xx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DRGpnCaxqS5q for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from scalix.yyy.yy (scalix.yyy.yy [195.202.144.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.xxx.xx (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD44B96F5 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:35:06 +0200 (CEST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1210678495.59215@UHHnSw//utRH4988ysGNag Received: from scalix.yyy.yy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scalix.yyy.yy (8.13.6/8.13.6/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id m46BYtqa026770 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 13:34:55 +0200 Received: from [10.222.0.240] (fwint.yyy.yy [195.202.144.1]) by scalix.yyy.yy (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.3.0.11339) via ESMTP; Tue, 06 May 2008 13:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 13:34:23 +0200 From: Martin Hochreiter To: martin.hochreiter@xxx.xx Message-ID: <4820423F.3010008@yyy.yy> Subject: test x-scalix-Hops: 1 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070109070806060504000007" X-FH-StP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m46BYtqa026770 X-FH-StP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FH-StP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-104.264, required 3, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_50_60 0.13, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.00) X-FH-StP-MailScanner-From: martin.hochreiter@yyy.yy --------------------------------------------------------------

Please try this patch. If you can get more feedback from yo

Tue, 06 May 2008 16:04:35 +0000

Please try this patch. If you can get more feedback from your procmail experts on what's wrong with our generated .procmailrc that would be great.

I had the same problem with my procmail-vacation script. wit

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:08:49 +0000

I had the same problem with my procmail-vacation script. with the two additional brackets from the patch it now works fine. thanks!

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.h

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:22:50 +0000

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/ingo/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.194&r2=1.195&ty=u http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/ingo/lib/Script/procmail.php?r1=1.96&r2=1.97&ty=u

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.h

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:25:38 +0000

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/ingo/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.55.2.99&r2=1.55.2.100&ty=u http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/ingo/lib/Script/procmail.php?r1=1.46.10.28&r2=1.46.10.29&ty=u

Hi, yes the time period works now with the patch - a repl

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:05:37 +0000

Hi, yes the time period works now with the patch - a reply mail is correctly sent BUT the incoming mail is not stored in my mailbox any more ....

Can you attach the vacation rule that is generated for procm

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:26:45 +0000

Can you attach the vacation rule that is generated for procmail?

Forget it Matt - the mails have just arrived it lasted a lit

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:29:03 +0000

Forget it Matt - the mails have just arrived it lasted a little bit longer ... lg Martin

Glad to hear it.

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:31:24 +0000

Glad to hear it.