<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://dev.horde.org/themes/horde//default/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?> 
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> 
 <channel> 
  <title>Gallery/Tile name lock</title> 
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 21:37:07 +0000</pubDate> 
  <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212</link> 
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="Gallery/Tile name lock" href="https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212/rss" /> 
  <description>Gallery/Tile name lock</description> 
 
   
   
  <item> 
   <title>In a public community logic users, as this is their virtual </title> 
   <description>In a public community logic users, as this is their virtual life, identifies them-self with their nicknames. So wrap users identities/preferences to not load other users preferences if values are locked, as will always be empty and we always display  &quot;only&quot; the &quot;Username&quot; od &quot;User&#039;s gallery&quot;. This will save even who additional queries for every different user in gallery list (one for Horde one for Ansel, up to 18 if listing 9 galleries from other users).</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:53:02 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212#t41952</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>slightly better</title> 
   <description>slightly better</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:59:22 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212#t41953</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>While I understand what your trying to do here, and I agree </title> 
   <description>While I understand what your trying to do here, and I agree with the idea - wouldn&#039;t something like this be best handled in the respective Prefs / Identities classes themselves instead of having to wrap them in every application that would want to access them?



Any one else have any thoughts on this?</description> 
   <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:26:03 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212#t42051</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>I agree, this is really an ugly hack.</title> 
   <description>I agree, this is really an ugly hack.</description> 
   <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:20 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212#t42055</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>If the classes will do it themselves, loading the owner pref</title> 
   <description>If the classes will do it themselves, loading the owner prefs will be needed - as now. The wrap prevents object creation and pref db access. If you wont I can create a static function to get the names instead of wrapping objects if you think it will be cleaner.</description> 
   <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:25:01 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212#t42067</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>I&#039;m still inclined to not include this in official Ansel cod</title> 
   <description>I&#039;m still inclined to not include this in official Ansel code.  It&#039;s a good idea for improving performance in a very specific use case, but using class wrappers, or even another static function to get information we already have a nice API to deal with still seems a bit hackish to me.

</description> 
   <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6212#t42176</link> 
  </item> 
   
   
 
 </channel> 
</rss> 
