Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:20:04 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539 IMAP stop-script rules halt all processing, not just processing of the matched message I have rules A, B, and C. I have unseen messages #1 through #9. #1 - Matches rule A. #2 - A #3 - A #4 - B #5 - A #6 - B #7 - C #8 - C #9 - B My options are set up to only filter unseen messages and to apply the filter rules whenever the Inbox is displayed. Upon first login, messages matching filter rule A (#1, #2, #3, #5) will get filtered. No other messages get filtered. Refreshing the Inbox immediately results in messages matching filter rule B (#4, #6, and #9) being filtered. Refreshing the Inbox again results in the remaining messages getting filtered by rule C. All rules have the "Stop checking if this rule applies" checkbox marked, but that should not prevent the other rules from running in the same session. Expected behavior should be that messages #1 through #9 get filtered by the 3 different rules. Just an assumption that maybe a "stop checking other rules" flag is being set on larger variable scope instead of just the current message being filtered? Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:56:40 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t35033 Which script backend are you using? Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:44:17 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t35598 > Which script backend are you using? I'm not entirely sure what you mean. Like what version of PHP? Should be PHP 5.2.3 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:52:53 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t35602 No. Sieve? IMAP filters? Procmail? Maildrop? Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:00:47 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t35608 If the filters are executed on login and refresh, he has to be using imap. Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:25:18 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t35614 It looks to me like we simply do a break, aborting all further rules, if a stop-script rule matches in the imap driver. Since we're processing multiple messages at once, this makes no sense. I think what we should do instead is store a cache of the imap uids that have matched stop rules, and exclude them from all future rules. Does that make sense? Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:28:22 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t35632 > I think what we should do instead is store a cache of the imap uids > that have matched stop rules, and exclude them from all future rules. > Does that make sense? Yes, it does. Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:42:37 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t35985 Implemented for Ingo 1.2. Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:30:31 +0000 https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5539#t36421