<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://dev.horde.org/themes/horde//default/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?> 
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> 
 <channel> 
  <title>For LDAP {authentication, group, portal, session} use shared config</title> 
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:14:16 +0000</pubDate> 
  <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250</link> 
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="For LDAP {authentication, group, portal, session} use shared config" href="https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250/rss" /> 
  <description>For LDAP {authentication, group, portal, session} use shared config</description> 
 
   
   
  <item> 
   <title>In much the same manner that most database configs can use a</title> 
   <description>In much the same manner that most database configs can use a horde_defaults value (which reuse many of the base database configuration items and provides a default table name for each config area), expand all LDAP-related configuration items to follow this model.  basedn, hostpec, port, bindn, and password could be reused and default RDNs be specified, but configurable for things like People, Groups, Sessions, etc.</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:29:45 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250#t9674</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>The problem is that such a configuration can&#039;t be introduced</title> 
   <description>The problem is that such a configuration can&#039;t be introduced without breaking BC because we need a new configuration tag.

Stalled until Horde 4.</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 07:31:04 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250#t9679</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>We could introduce it in Horde, though. That way Horde confi</title> 
   <description>We could introduce it in Horde, though. That way Horde configs can use it, and other apps can reference it in config files like sources.php  - they just can&#039;t rely on it in driver code. Right?</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:13:40 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250#t9688</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>True.</title> 
   <description>True.</description> 
   <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250#t9690</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>I&#039;m going to assign this to the Bens, hopefully for Horde 3.</title> 
   <description>I&#039;m going to assign this to the Bens, hopefully for Horde 3.2. Possible?</description> 
   <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:59:02 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250#t38216</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>This has been implemented in Horde 4. It&#039;s not used in all p</title> 
   <description>This has been implemented in Horde 4. It&#039;s not used in all places yet, but the basis is there, so it can be added without BC breakage.</description> 
   <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:02:51 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/2250#t65883</link> 
  </item> 
   
   
 
 </channel> 
</rss> 
