<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://dev.horde.org/themes/horde//default/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?> 
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> 
 <channel> 
  <title>Adding &quot;AUTH: PLAIN&quot; in IMP&#039;s Received header</title> 
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 14:41:44 +0000</pubDate> 
  <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771</link> 
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="Adding &quot;AUTH: PLAIN&quot; in IMP&#039;s Received header" href="https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771/rss" /> 
  <description>Adding &quot;AUTH: PLAIN&quot; in IMP&#039;s Received header</description> 
 
   
   
  <item> 
   <title>Now IMP&#039;s Received lokks like this:

Received: from 178-16</title> 
   <description>Now IMP&#039;s Received lokks like this:

Received: from 178-164-130-123.pool.digikabel.hu
	(178-164-130-123.pool.digikabel.hu [178.164.130.123]) by
	worker.szepe.net
	(Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:58:16 +0000

Please consider adding somthing like
(AUTH: PLAIN viktor@worker.szepe.net, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3, 128bits, AES128-SHA)
Courier-mta adds this when sending throuhg SMTPS.

1.
zdkimfilter (only DKIM implementation for Courier-mta) needs an authenticated user to add DKIM signiture
2.
The user is indeed authenticated, logged in to Horde.
3.
IMP says &quot;with HTTP&quot; even when https:// is used.

Thank you very much!
</description> 
   <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t86968</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>If Courier&#039;s MTA already does this, why should Horde add tha</title> 
   <description>If Courier&#039;s MTA already does this, why should Horde add that?
HTTP is correct, because it&#039;s the protocol, not the security layer.</description> 
   <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:32:44 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t86976</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>&gt; If Courier&#039;s MTA already does this, why should Horde add t</title> 
   <description>&gt; If Courier&#039;s MTA already does this, why should Horde add that?
&gt; HTTP is correct, because it&#039;s the protocol, not the security layer.

Courier adds the &quot;AUTH:&quot; line only on authenticated SMTP/S.
Horde sends email through sendmail or unauthenticated SMTP. In these cases there is no &quot;AUTH:&quot; line in the Received header.

It would be very nice to have a config option to add the &quot;AUTH:&quot; line to Horde&#039;s Received header.
Thank you!
</description> 
   <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 17:45:41 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t86977</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>zdkimfilter check this line:

(authuserbuf = strstr(p2, &quot;A</title> 
   <description>zdkimfilter check this line:

(authuserbuf = strstr(p2, &quot;AUTH: &quot;)) != NULL

written in C
http://www.tana.it/svn/zdkimfilter/trunk/src/zdkimfilter.c
</description> 
   <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t86978</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>&gt; Please consider adding somthing like
&gt; (AUTH: PLAIN vikto</title> 
   <description>&gt; Please consider adding somthing like
&gt; (AUTH: PLAIN viktor@worker.szepe.net, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3, 128bits, AES128-SHA)

Why?  Re: the SSL transport parameters - there is no way for PHP to know this information since PHP != HTTP server.

&gt; Courier-mta adds this when sending throuhg SMTPS.

AUTH is defined by SMTP.

There is no protocol definition for connecting to the Horde framework.  So reporting &quot;AUTH&quot; is simply not semantically correct.

&gt; 1.
&gt; zdkimfilter (only DKIM implementation for Courier-mta) needs an 
&gt; authenticated user to add DKIM signiture

What does this have to do with Horde?

&gt; 2.
&gt; The user is indeed authenticated, logged in to Horde.

Exactly.  So there is NO authentication from browser-&gt;Horde.  The browser is simply the display window for using Horde.

&gt; 3.
&gt; IMP says &quot;with HTTP&quot; even when https:// is used.

What Jan said - HTTP is the protocol used to connect to the Horde server.  There is no such thing as HTTPS as a protocol - it is just HTTP with TLS security.</description> 
   <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:45:07 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t86990</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>&gt; If Courier&#039;s MTA already does this, why should Horde add t</title> 
   <description>&gt; If Courier&#039;s MTA already does this, why should Horde add that?

Exactly.  Horde needs to connect to Courier&#039;s MTA, and this connection needs to be authenticated, so the authentication details will be added to *that* received header.  Which is correct (especially since the Horde username != the username of the user authorized to relay mail.)</description> 
   <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t86991</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>Thank you for your answers.
To keep it short:
I&#039;d like to </title> 
   <description>Thank you for your answers.
To keep it short:
I&#039;d like to implement DKIM.
zdkimfilter adds the DKIM signiture to messages
containing &quot;AUTH: &quot;
So I need that string in Horde&#039;s email also.
Horde is set to use plain SMTP only.

Should I hack it into Horde&#039;s source code?
</description> 
   <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t86993</link> 
  </item> 
   
  <item> 
   <title>All you need to do is to configure Horde to use SMTP authent</title> 
   <description>All you need to do is to configure Horde to use SMTP authentication.</description> 
   <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:22:20 +0000</pubDate> 
   <link>https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13771#t87002</link> 
  </item> 
   
   
 
 </channel> 
</rss> 
