empty "to" field at reply

If the description of the sender is the same as the recipien

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:54:47 +0000

If the description of the sender is the same as the recipient and you reply, the to field will be empty. From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Kir=E1ly_L=E1szl=F3?= To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Kir=E1ly_L=E1szl=F3?=

> If the description of the sender is the same as the recipi

Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:49:27 +0000

> If the description of the sender is the same as the recipient and you > reply, the to field will be empty. > > From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Kir=E1ly_L=E1szl=F3?= > To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Kir=E1ly_L=E1szl=F3?= Is the from address one of your personal addresses?

>> If the description of the sender is the same as the recip

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:13:25 +0000

>> If the description of the sender is the same as the recipient and you >> reply, the to field will be empty. >> >> From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Kir=E1ly_L=E1szl=F3?= >> To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Kir=E1ly_L=E1szl=F3?= > > Is the from address one of your personal addresses? No, I got an email, and I tried to reply.

Can't reproduce. master or imp_6_2. From/To address are id

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 04:49:15 +0000

Can't reproduce. master or imp_6_2. From/To address are identical, and when replying I get a single address in the To box (whether reply auto, reply all, or reply sender).

> Can't reproduce. master or imp_6_2. From/To address are

Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:32:11 +0000

> Can't reproduce. master or imp_6_2. From/To address are identical, > and when replying I get a single address in the To box (whether reply > auto, reply all, or reply sender). In my case, the addresses aren't identical, but the descriptions of the addresses. If I have some time, I'll debug this issue.

Marking as not a bug unless/until somebody can reliably repr

Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:17:54 +0000

Marking as not a bug unless/until somebody can reliably reproduce.

> Marking as not a bug unless/until somebody can reliably re

Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:28:01 +0000

> Marking as not a bug unless/until somebody can reliably reproduce. It's very easy to reproduce. Just create two identity with the same accented full name and different email address . Send a mail from one to other and try to reply.

>> Marking as not a bug unless/until somebody can reliably r

Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:24:42 +0000

>> Marking as not a bug unless/until somebody can reliably reproduce. > > It's very easy to reproduce. Just create two identity with the same > accented full name and different email address . > Send a mail from one to other and try to reply. Please attach the full message source of a message where you see this. Although I continue to have my doubts, since the address comparison code has nothing to do with the personal part - it only compares the email addresses. The data in the personal part is irrelevant.

Here you are. > Please attach the full message source o

Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:22:30 +0000

Here you are. > Please attach the full message source of a message where you see this. > > Although I continue to have my doubts, since the address comparison > code has nothing to do with the personal part - it only compares the > email addresses. The data in the personal part is irrelevant.

> Here you are. When replying to all, I actually get 2

Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:33:01 +0000

> Here you are. When replying to all, I actually get *2* addresses: l.kiraly@madalbal.hu in To, kiru@madalbal.hu in Cc. When replying to sender, I get l.kiraly@madalbal.hu in To. Are you positive that l.kiraly@madalbal.hu is not contained in one of your identities? All emails contained in your identity are stripped out from replies. Which would explain why you see this but nobody else does.

> Are you positive that @.hu is not contained in one o

Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:49:07 +0000

> Are you positive that ***@***.hu is not contained in one of > your identities? All emails contained in your identity are stripped > out from replies. Which would explain why you see this but nobody > else does. You got the point. Close this ticket please.