Tickets :: Comment on [#7989] Request: Support for task relations in SyncML

* Your Email Address
* Spam protection	Enter the letters below: ____ _____ _____ _____ _____ / __ \\| __ \\| __ \\| __ \\| __ \ \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|__) \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| _ / \| \|__\| \| \|__\| \| \|__\| \| \|__\| \| \| \ \ \___\_\_____/\|_____/\|_____/\|_\| \_\
Comment	> Haven't found the time to work on this yet, but I'm wondering whether > it is useful at all, since from what I hear horde 4 will have a new > Active Sync component: > > "Horde 4 will also sport more mobile device features with an > ActiveSync server component entering the main development tree in > time for the final release." (from > http://www.techworld.com.au/article/342104/horde_open_source_groupware_preps_version_4_release) > > Do you anticipate that task relations will work out of the box in Horde 4? > >>> I don't see the RELATED-TO field being removed anywhere. >> >> I don't think we remove it. Off my head I'm pretty sure we only >> remove the UID attribute. >> >>> Also, are you interested in such a patch? >> >> I can barely imagine a clean solution with the current SyncML >> library, but we would definitely look at a patch. >
Attachment
Watch this ticket