| Summary | setting no privileges for some users from a group |
| Queue | Horde Base |
| Queue Version | HEAD |
| Type | Enhancement |
| State | Rejected |
| Priority | 2. Medium |
| Owners | |
| Requester | m.zdila (at) episoftware (dot) com |
| Created | 11/19/2004 (7657 days ago) |
| Due | |
| Updated | 11/24/2004 (7652 days ago) |
| Assigned | |
| Resolved | 11/20/2004 (7656 days ago) |
| Milestone | |
| Patch | No |
user, so he can't read / write / modify the object. Despite of that it
is ugly, it works :-).
State ⇒ Rejected
subgroup and exclude the users who shouldn't have permissions.
Negative permissions are pretty much impossible to implement sanely
(i.e., performance goes all to hell).
State ⇒ New
Priority ⇒ 2. Medium
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Summary ⇒ setting no privileges for some users from a group
Queue ⇒ Horde Base
users from that group to have no privileges to the same object.
Unfortunately it is not possible to add empty privileges to an user,
because unchecking all the checkboxes causes removing that user from
the list. It would be fine to not to remove the user with no checkbox
checked. Removing should be done using one extra checkbox (remove).