6.0.0-RC7
6/27/26

[#5206] Sort deliverables in tree order, not straight alphabetical
Summary Sort deliverables in tree order, not straight alphabetical
Queue Hermes
Type Bug
State Not A Bug
Priority 1. Low
Owners
Requester gnuwings (at) gmail (dot) com
Created 4/4/07 (7024 days ago)
Due
Updated 4/10/07 (7018 days ago)
Assigned 4/10/07 (7018 days ago)
Resolved 4/10/07 (7018 days ago)
Github Issue Link
Github Pull Request
Milestone
Patch No

History
456 Chuck Hagenbuch State ⇒ Not A Bug
 
226 gnuwings (at) gmail (dot) com Comment #6 Reply to this comment
Today I tried to cleanup all the deliverables and added it again and 
the problem is not observed. I don't know what had happened before. 
But it's true that the problem was there. Since this is not reported 
by others, we can close this ticket.
496 Jan Schneider Comment #5
State ⇒ Feedback
Reply to this comment
I can't reproduce this. The deliverables are sorted fine for me in 
hierarchical order.
35 Chuck Hagenbuch Summary ⇒ Sort deliverables in tree order, not straight alphabetical
State ⇒
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
 
345 Chuck Hagenbuch Deleted Original Message
 
275 Chuck Hagenbuch Deleted Original Message
 
269 gnuwings (at) gmail (dot) com Comment #4 Reply to this comment
You mean it's not sorted how you expect it to be? Please clarify.
Yes, you are right. The list was not sorted as I expect.
2911 Chuck Hagenbuch Comment #3
State ⇒ Feedback
Reply to this comment
You mean it's not sorted how you expect it to be? Please clarify.
235 gnuwings (at) gmail (dot) com Comment #2
New Attachment: newtime.jpg
Reply to this comment
I forgot to add the second screenshot.
305 gnuwings (at) gmail (dot) com Comment #1
Priority ⇒ 2. Medium
State ⇒ Unconfirmed
New Attachment: deliverables-admin.jpg
Queue ⇒ Hermes
Summary ⇒ Deliverable Hierarchy broken
Type ⇒ Bug
Reply to this comment
I tried to create hierarchical Deliverables in this order:

1. Business Applications

1.1 CRM

1.2 VRM

2. Human Resources

2.1 Recruiting

3.  Networking

3.1 Local Area Network



In the *New Time* page, the cost object drop down is messed up with 
this hierarchy. Please refer the attached screenshots.


Saved Queries