bug with procmail forwarding recipe

The built-in forward recipe for procmail does not appear to

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:02:06 +0000

The built-in forward recipe for procmail does not appear to work correctly in all cases. I was forwarding an e-mail address to gmail and the confirmation e-mail wasn't forwarded. See the logs below. As a work around, I just built a regular recipe. procmail: [15047] Wed Aug 13 16:45:38 2008 procmail: No match on "^BestServHost: crater\.dragonflybsd\.org" procmail: No match on "^Sender: horde-" procmail: No match on "^Subject: Logwatch for" procmail: No match on "^Subject: rsnapshot hourly" procmail: No match on "^List-Id: rsnapshot discussion" procmail: No match on "^Subject: Cron" procmail: No match on "^Subject: DenyHosts Report from" procmail: No match on "^Subject: Virus Detected" procmail: No match on "^From: .MailScanner" procmail: No match on "^Sender: AirSet" procmail: No match on "^X-Spam-Status: Yes" procmail: Assigning "MATCH=" procmail: Matched "xxxxxxxxxx+gmcfv4790c0e5c2cb0154@gmail.com" procmail: No match on ! "^From *\/[^ ]+" procmail: Assigning "OUTPUT=xxxxxxxxxx+gmcfv4790c0e5c2cb0154@gmail.com" procmail: No match on ! "(^(((Resent-)?(From|Sender)|X-Envelope-From):|>?From )([^>]*[^(.% @a-z0-9])?(Post(ma(st(er)?|n)|office)|(send)?Mail(er)?|daemon|mmdf|n?uucp|ops|r(esponse|oo t)|(bbs\.)?smtp(error)?|s(erv(ices?|er)|ystem)|A(dmin(istrator)?|MMGR))(([^).!:a-z0-9][-_a -z0-9]*)?[%@> ][^<)]*($.*$.*)?)?$([^>]|$))" procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/home/tim/Maildir/new/1218663938.15047_0.xxxxx.xxxxx.com " procmail: Notified comsat: "tim@0:/home/tim/Maildir/new/1218663938.15047_0.xxxxx.xxxxx.com" From xxxxxxxxxx+gmcfv4790c0e5c2cb0154@gmail.com Wed Aug 13 16:45:38 2008 Subject: Gmail Confirmation - Send Mail as tim@xxxxx.xxxxx.com Folder: /home/tim/Maildir/new/1218663938.15047_0.xxxxx.xxxxx.com 4134

Can you post the recipe that Ingo generated and what you cha

Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:14:20 +0000

Can you post the recipe that Ingo generated and what you changed it to in order to get it to work?

Ping?

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:51:02 +0000

Ping?

> Can you post the recipe that Ingo generated and what you c

Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:47:33 +0000

> Can you post the recipe that Ingo generated and what you changed it > to in order to get it to work? Top receipe is what I used (doesn't handle loops, I know, it was a quick work around). Bottom was Ingo generated. ##### Forward All ##### :0 D * ^Received: . ! forwarded@email.com ##### Forwards ##### :0 { :0 *$ ! ^From *\/[^ ]+ *$ ! ^Sender: *\/[^ ]+ *$ ! ^From: *\/[^ ]+ *$ ! ^Reply-to: *\/[^ ]+ { OUTPUT = `formail -zxFrom:` } :0 E { OUTPUT = $MATCH } :0 c * !^FROM_MAILER * !^X-Loop: to-forwarded@email.com | formail -A"X-Loop: to-fforwarded@email.com" | $SENDMAIL -oi -f $OUTPUT forwarded@email.com :0 E $DEFAULT :0 /dev/null }

Can anybody using Procmail provide a real solution/patch?

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:06:43 +0000

Can anybody using Procmail provide a real solution/patch?

Reposting, because email notifications didn't work: Can any

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:31:31 +0000

Reposting, because email notifications didn't work: Can anybody using Procmail provide a real solution/patch?

I guess not.

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:58:04 +0000

I guess not.

I modified it as follows: 58: ##### DEAKTIVIERT: Weiterl

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:12:40 +0000

I modified it as follows: 58: ##### DEAKTIVIERT: Weiterleitung ##### 59: # :0 cw 60: # { 61: # :0 c 62: # * !^(From|Sender|X-Envelope-From):.*(Postmaster|MAILER-DAEMON)@ 63: # * !^X-Loop: to-test@gmail.com 64: # | formail -A"X-Loop: to-test@gmail.com" | $SENDMAIL -oi test@gmail.com 65: # :0 c 66: # * !^(From|Sender|X-Envelope-From):.*(Postmaster|MAILER-DAEMON)@ 67: # * !^X-Loop: to-test@gmx.at 68: # | formail -A"X-Loop: to-test@gmx.at" | $SENDMAIL -oi test@gmx.at 69: # :0 70: # /dev/null 71: # } kind regards

Can you elaborate on your patch, what exactly it does any wh

Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:03:51 +0000

Can you elaborate on your patch, what exactly it does any why? I mostly see large code segments simply being commented out, which rings an alarm for me.