Link address labels (To, CC, BCC) to address book

Hello together, attached patch links the address labels (

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:10:28 -0400

Hello together, attached patch links the address labels (To, CC, BCC) to the address book as it's quite common in some desktop mail clients and users are used to it. Please check if the close of the is done right by appending "". Cheers, Thomas

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.h

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:10:26 -0400

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/imp/compose.php?r1=2.1096&r2=2.1097&ty=u http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/imp/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.1141&r2=1.1142&ty=u

Committed, thanks.

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:14:27 -0400

Committed, thanks.

I'm really unhappy with the implementation, because now, if

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:17:21 -0400

I'm really unhappy with the implementation, because now, if you use an access key to navigate to the address fields, the cursor is no longer placed into the field, but instead the address book pops up. Actually the labels don't work anymore at all, which also reduces accessibility.

Would you suggest the old labels with accesskeys, and separa

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:26:25 -0400

Would you suggest the old labels with accesskeys, and separate buttons? Or would you veto the buttons in general?

I think they're redundant, because we have the same button u

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:19:25 -0400

I think they're redundant, because we have the same button up to 4 times now on the compose screen. But if people really want them, they should be separate buttons I guess.

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.h

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:47:13 -0400

Changes have been made in CVS for this ticket: http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/imp/compose.php?r1=2.1109&r2=2.1110&ty=u http://cvs.horde.org/diff.php/imp/docs/CHANGES?r1=1.1158&r2=1.1159&ty=u

And now that I think of it, we've rejected this before. Reve

Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:47:30 -0400

And now that I think of it, we've rejected this before. Reverted.

> And now that I think of it, we've rejected this before. Re

Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:29:13 -0400

> And now that I think of it, we've rejected this before. Reverted. If a feature request pops up again and again, then there must be a reason for it :-) Is there a way we can have both the links and the accessor keys?