Tickets :: [#6933] Reply HTML: keep table layout

6.0.0-beta1

7/18/25

Summary	Reply HTML: keep table layout
Queue	IMP
Queue Version	HEAD
Type	Enhancement
State	Rejected
Priority	1. Low
Owners
Requester	rsalmon (at) mbpgroup (dot) com
Created	06/16/2008 (6241 days ago)
Due
Updated	06/17/2008 (6240 days ago)
Assigned
Resolved	06/17/2008 (6240 days ago)
Milestone
Patch	No

06/17/2008 11:21:06 AM	rsalmon (at) mbpgroup (dot) com	Comment #9	Reply to this comment
It doesn't do that. You are not using IMP HEAD as stated in this report. I do use the latest HEAD version (updated this morning). And if reply_format is set to 0, compose_html is set to 1 and reply to an email html (eg attach email.elm) : html email is converted to text before composing and gives the attach file reply.elm

06/17/2008 10:56:24 AM	Jan Schneider	Comment #8	Reply to this comment
It doesn't do that. You are not using IMP HEAD as stated in this report.

06/17/2008 10:46:17 AM	rsalmon (at) mbpgroup (dot) com	Comment #7	Reply to this comment
That's what I said, it works perfectly here. Got it. this is option 'reply_format'. I think that, If user has option compose_html checked and replies to an HTML email, IMP shouldn't convert HTML email to text before composing in HTML. option 'reply_format' should only be used when user compose format differs from email's format. eg : reply_format : 0 / compose_html : 0 / email text : nothing to do reply_format : 0 / compose_html : 0 / email html : convert to text reply_format : 0 / compose_html : 1 / email text : convert to HTML reply_format : 0 / compose_html : 1 / email html : nothing to do reply_format : 1 / compose_html : 0 / email text : nothing to do reply_format : 1 / compose_html : 0 / email html : nothing to do but compose in HTML reply_format : 1 / compose_html : 1 / email text : nothing to do but compose in text reply_format : 1 / compose_html : 1 / email html : nothing to do

06/17/2008 10:43:42 AM	Jan Schneider	Comment #6 State ⇒ Rejected	Reply to this comment
What do you mean by "it works perfectly here". When you reply to email.elm, do you still have the HTML table tags ? Yes. Please use the mailing list for further support.

06/17/2008 10:19:26 AM	rsalmon (at) mbpgroup (dot) com	Comment #5	Reply to this comment
That's what I said, it works perfectly here. :-( What do you mean by "it works perfectly here". When you reply to email.elm, do you still have the HTML table tags ? If so, what am I missing, is it a configuration option ? I didn't see any option to convert html to text before replying.

06/17/2008 09:31:02 AM	Jan Schneider	Comment #4	Reply to this comment
That's what I said, it works perfectly here.

06/17/2008 07:25:09 AM	rsalmon (at) mbpgroup (dot) com	Comment #3 New Attachment: reply.elm	Reply to this comment
Works perfectly for me. What are you missing? email.elm is the source, message received. I've attached reply.elm which is the result of replying to email.elm. As you can see, the table tags are gone and so is the table's layout. Is it possible to keep the table as it is like thunderbird (or event squirrelmail) does ? Thanks.

06/16/2008 05:54:58 PM	Jan Schneider	Comment #2 State ⇒ Feedback	Reply to this comment
Works perfectly for me. What are you missing?

06/16/2008 11:17:57 AM	rsalmon (at) mbpgroup (dot) com	Comment #1 Priority ⇒ 1. Low State ⇒ New New Attachment: email.elm Patch ⇒ No Milestone ⇒ Queue ⇒ IMP Summary ⇒ Reply HTML: keep table layout Type ⇒ Enhancement	Reply to this comment
When replying (forwarding body text only), is it possible to keep the table layout ? See attach email as an exemple. Is it possible to reply to that email without having IMP/horde trying to remove the HTML tags (or some of them) ?