<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://bugs.horde.org/themes/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <title>Add another webdav directory level for share owners</title>
  <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:07:22 -0400</pubDate>
  <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594</link>
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="Add another webdav directory level for share owners" href="http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594/rss" />
  <description>Add another webdav directory level for share owners</description>

  
  
  <item>
   <title>See bug 3032 and http://lists.horde.org/archives/cvs/Week-of</title>
   <description>See bug 3032 and http://lists.horde.org/archives/cvs/Week-of-Mon-20080407/077263.html

From Jan:
Calendars in Kronolith for example are available now as:

/kronolith/owner/calname/event
/kronolith/owner/calname.ics

The idea is a) to have more structure, but more important b) to later   allow to create shares/resources from WebDAV (CalDAV) actually. To avoid share name clashing we discussed that users can create those share, but they will be prefixed with the user name. The WebDAV structure is going to do something similar. We could maybe even add some black magic to automatically strip and the user prefix from/to share names when displayed/added through the DAV interface.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:14:52 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t44578</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>I will do here similar to what I did to Nag.</title>
   <description>I will do here similar to what I did to Nag.</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:23:35 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45018</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Where are we with this ticket? We still have to decide on Tu</title>
   <description>Where are we with this ticket? We still have to decide on Turba's structure, right? All other share applications are done?</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:48:56 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45328</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>everything else that has webdav, yes</title>
   <description>everything else that has webdav, yes</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:56:31 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45332</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Ok, and looking at the archive the few replies all prefered </title>
   <description>Ok, and looking at the archive the few replies all prefered a system/ prefix for global folders. Ben, do you think you will be able to implement this during the next week? This is the last remaining show stopper.</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:32:49 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45337</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Actually browse support is already in place (in time for RC4</title>
   <description>Actually browse support is already in place (in time for RC4).  I still need to do delete and put, but that should not be a problem to complete this week.  Of course wider testing would be appreciated too.</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:43:03 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45338</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Delete is done, correct? And PUT didn't exist so there's no </title>
   <description>Delete is done, correct? And PUT didn't exist so there's no need to update it. Anything else? Is this merged?</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:51:19 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45515</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>&gt; Delete is done, correct? And PUT didn't exist so there's n</title>
   <description>&gt; Delete is done, correct? And PUT didn't exist so there's no need to 
&gt; update it. Anything else? Is this merged?

Browse and delete are done and merged.  I wanted to do PUT as well but it does not exist and I did not have the time to do it before memorial day weekend.  If PUT is not a 3.2 showstopper then this can be closed.</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:13:48 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45517</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>In my opinion PUT is not a showstopper since it'd be a new f</title>
   <description>In my opinion PUT is not a showstopper since it'd be a new feature for Turba. Closing - thanks!</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:23:05 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6594#t45518</link>
  </item>
  

 </channel>
</rss>
