6.0.0-alpha12
6/8/25

[#6373] "Save As" feature missing in dimp
Summary "Save As" feature missing in dimp
Queue DIMP
Queue Version HEAD
Type Enhancement
State Rejected
Priority 1. Low
Owners
Requester marco.peterseil (at) partner-treuhand (dot) at
Created 03/05/2008 (6304 days ago)
Due
Updated 03/14/2008 (6295 days ago)
Assigned
Resolved 03/11/2008 (6298 days ago)
Milestone
Patch No

History
03/14/2008 02:51:05 AM Michael Slusarz Comment #8 Reply to this comment
That makes sense. Marco, can you please start such a page on the wiki?
I started a page at http://wiki.horde.org/DimpRoadmap
03/12/2008 07:14:23 AM marco (dot) peterseil (at) partner-treuhand (dot) at Comment #7 Reply to this comment
That makes sense. Marco, can you please start such a page on the wiki?
Ahh yes that's a good idea. I've totally forgot about the wiki :)
03/11/2008 08:10:31 AM Jan Schneider Comment #6
State ⇒ Rejected
Reply to this comment
That makes sense. Marco, can you please start such a page on the wiki?
03/11/2008 04:42:15 AM Michael Slusarz Comment #5 Reply to this comment
That's how I understood the request and that's why it's low priority.
We probably won't port all IMP features to DIMP and we don't have a
list of portable features either, so why not accept request for
certain features, just as a reminder?
I'd rather see this as a wiki page/roadmap, which would give us a 
chance to plot out priorties and tasks all in one place.  But this 
ticket is probably not useful for further discussion on this topic.
03/06/2008 10:08:12 AM Jan Schneider Comment #4 Reply to this comment
That's how I understood the request and that's why it's low priority. 
We probably won't port all IMP features to DIMP and we don't have a 
list of portable features either, so why not accept request for 
certain features, just as a reminder?
03/06/2008 07:38:21 AM marco (dot) peterseil (at) partner-treuhand (dot) at Comment #3 Reply to this comment
I am questioning the usefulness of these requests.  *Any* IMP feature
not yet in DIMP could potentially be a feature request.  Should we
open 1,000 tickets for each one of those features.  There's a bunch
of features more important than Save As, so simply because 1 person
opens a ticket shouldn't mean its somehow more important.
Well well, of course it's not more important than other requests !!!

I just wanted to remind that this useful function from IMP would be 
great to see in DIMP. Maybe there was no intend to do that and so I 
just wanted to make a request that this will not be forgotten.
03/06/2008 02:41:01 AM Michael Slusarz Comment #2 Reply to this comment
I am questioning the usefulness of these requests.  *Any* IMP feature 
not yet in DIMP could potentially be a feature request.  Should we 
open 1,000 tickets for each one of those features.  There's a bunch of 
features more important than Save As, so simply because 1 person opens 
a ticket shouldn't mean its somehow more important.
03/06/2008 12:44:02 AM Jan Schneider State ⇒ Accepted
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
 
03/05/2008 07:46:48 AM marco (dot) peterseil (at) partner-treuhand (dot) at Comment #1
Priority ⇒ 3. High
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Summary ⇒ "Save As" feature missing in dimp
Queue ⇒ DIMP
State ⇒ New
Reply to this comment
I think this is a crucial feature, especially for companys with 
document managment systems, that should possibly with dimp.

Saved Queries