| Summary | "Save As" feature missing in dimp |
| Queue | DIMP |
| Queue Version | HEAD |
| Type | Enhancement |
| State | Rejected |
| Priority | 1. Low |
| Owners | |
| Requester | marco (dot) peterseil (at) partner-treuhand (dot) at |
| Created | 03/05/2008 (67 days ago) |
| Due | |
| Updated | 03/13/2008 (59 days ago) |
| Assigned | |
| Resolved | 03/11/2008 (61 days ago) |
| Attachments | |
| Milestone | |
| Patch |
> That makes sense. Marco, can you please start such a page on the wiki?
I started a page at http://wiki.horde.org/DimpRoadmap
> That makes sense. Marco, can you please start such a page on the wiki?Ahh yes that's a good idea. I've totally forgot about the wiki :)
State ⇒ Rejected
That makes sense. Marco, can you please start such a page on the wiki?> That's how I understood the request and that's why it's low priority.
> We probably won't port all IMP features to DIMP and we don't have a
> list of portable features either, so why not accept request for
> certain features, just as a reminder?
I'd rather see this as a wiki page/roadmap, which would give us a chance to plot out priorties and tasks all in one place. But this ticket is probably not useful for further discussion on this topic.
That's how I understood the request and that's why it's low priority. We probably won't port all IMP features to DIMP and we don't have a list of portable features either, so why not accept request for certain features, just as a reminder?> I am questioning the usefulness of these requests. *Any* IMP feature
> not yet in DIMP could potentially be a feature request. Should we
> open 1,000 tickets for each one of those features. There's a bunch
> of features more important than Save As, so simply because 1 person
> opens a ticket shouldn't mean its somehow more important.
Well well, of course it's not more important than other requests !!!
I just wanted to remind that this useful function from IMP would be great to see in DIMP. Maybe there was no intend to do that and so I just wanted to make a request that this will not be forgotten.
I am questioning the usefulness of these requests. *Any* IMP feature not yet in DIMP could potentially be a feature request. Should we open 1,000 tickets for each one of those features. There's a bunch of features more important than Save As, so simply because 1 person opens a ticket shouldn't mean its somehow more important.State ⇒ Accepted
Queue ⇒ DIMP
Summary ⇒ "Save As" feature missing in dimp
Type ⇒ Enhancement
Priority ⇒ 3. High
State ⇒ New
I think this is a crucial feature, especially for companys with document managment systems, that should possibly with dimp.