| Summary | Multiple actions |
| Queue | Ingo |
| Queue Version | HEAD |
| Type | Enhancement |
| State | Rejected |
| Priority | 1. Low |
| Owners | |
| Requester | michael (dot) menge (at) zdv (dot) uni-tuebingen (dot) de |
| Created | 11/14/2007 (179 days ago) |
| Due | |
| Updated | 11/15/2007 (178 days ago) |
| Assigned | |
| Resolved | 11/15/2007 (178 days ago) |
| Attachments | |
| Milestone | |
| Patch |
State ⇒ Rejected
Summary ⇒ Multiple actions
I think this is acceptable.You can do this with not using the "STOP", but you have to add a new rule with the same tests for each action.
You also have to change all rules if you need to change the test and the filterprogram has to evaluate the same test on a mail multiple times.
State ⇒ Feedback
Isn't this what NOT using the "stop checking if this rule matches" option is for? If you don't select that, you can have other rules match the message again and do more things with it.Summary ⇒ Multible actions
Type ⇒ Enhancement
State ⇒ New
Priority ⇒ 1. Low
Queue ⇒ Ingo
At the moment i is only possible to preform one action per rule (except of stop and keep)
You can't save a message in two folders, or redirect it and save ist in a folder, or redirect to multible addresses (i know the last part is possible with procmail if you use , or ; to seperate the emailaddresses, but sieve does not allow this)
It woule be nice to define multible actions like you can define
multible tests in a rule