<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://bugs.horde.org/themes/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <title>Improvements for namespace folder list</title>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:11:11 -0400</pubDate>
  <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030</link>
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="Improvements for namespace folder list" href="http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030/rss" />
  <description>Improvements for namespace folder list</description>

  
  
  <item>
   <title>I suggest to tweak the new folder tree view that separates p</title>
   <description>I suggest to tweak the new folder tree view that separates public and shared folders from personal folders. We should not display the namespace value that is used for the public and shared namespaces at all.
E.g. if I use the altnamepace setting with Cyrus, the tree currently looks like in the attached screen shot. This is obviously redundant. The namespaces the in this case look like:
((&quot;&quot; &quot;.&quot;)) ((&quot;Other Users.&quot; &quot;.&quot;)) ((&quot;Shared Folders.&quot; &quot;.&quot;))
But even without altnamespace ((&quot;INBOX.&quot; &quot;.&quot;)) ((&quot;user.&quot; &quot;.&quot;)) ((&quot;&quot; &quot;.&quot;)) it would make sense to remove the 'user' level from the 'Shared Folders' subtree.</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 05:16:22 -0500</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t29708</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>I can see this in cases where there is only one namespace in</title>
   <description>I can see this in cases where there is only one namespace in a given type - we could simply display all folders in the base directory (&quot;Shared Folders&quot;/&quot;Public Folders&quot;) like we do when one of these namespaces is blank.  However, if there are multiple namespaces for a given type we must display the way we currently do or else we risk collisions (i.e. if both shared folders contain a 'foo' mailbox, there is no way to display both of these if we have a flat display.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:25:03 -0500</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t29920</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>I think that would be a good compromise, especially since I'</title>
   <description>I think that would be a good compromise, especially since I've never seen multiple namespaces on a real world server.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 04:19:45 -0500</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t29930</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>How about this? (Jan?)
http://lists.horde.org/archives/cvs/</title>
   <description>How about this? (Jan?)
http://lists.horde.org/archives/cvs/Week-of-Mon-20070521/068044.html</description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 15:16:43 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t33563</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>My virtual folders are not displayed under the shared folder</title>
   <description>My virtual folders are not displayed under the shared folders node. If using the alternative namespaces like described in this ticket earlier the shared folders are displayed under the public folders node.</description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:21:53 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t33582</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>How about after this?
http://lists.horde.org/archives/cvs/W</title>
   <description>How about after this?
http://lists.horde.org/archives/cvs/Week-of-Mon-20070528/068284.html</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:34:23 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t33705</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>The virtual folders are fine again, but the shared folders s</title>
   <description>The virtual folders are fine again, but the shared folders still appear under public folders, and the empty shared folders node is still displayed.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:56:11 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t33708</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>&gt; The virtual folders are fine again, but the shared folders</title>
   <description>&gt; The virtual folders are fine again, but the shared folders still 
&gt; appear under public folders, and the empty shared folders node is 
&gt; still displayed.

I tried debugging this for hours and my tree looks identical to Jan's and I still could never reproduce.  So somebody that can reproduce this will have to take a look at this.</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:54:31 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t35221</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Jan, is this still an issue for you? It's the only showstopp</title>
   <description>Jan, is this still an issue for you? It's the only showstopper currently listed for IMP 4.2.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:46:48 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t38043</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>&gt; Jan, is this still an issue for you? It's the only showsto</title>
   <description>&gt; Jan, is this still an issue for you? It's the only showstopper 
&gt; currently listed for IMP 4.2.

An issue yes, but definitely not a show stopper.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:16:29 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t38062</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>This issue is finally fixed with the Tree rewrite, though th</title>
   <description>This issue is finally fixed with the Tree rewrite, though there is another one that I'll report separately.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:11:22 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/5030#t46903</link>
  </item>
  

 </channel>
</rss>
