<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://bugs.horde.org/themes/feed-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <title>Gnarwl Support</title>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:15:31 -0400</pubDate>
  <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/1834</link>
  <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" title="Gnarwl Support" href="http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/1834/rss" />
  <description>Gnarwl Support</description>

  
  
  <item>
   <title>This is basically support for using Gnarwl.  A few things to</title>
   <description>This is basically support for using Gnarwl.  A few things to comment about it though:

Basically I took the exim-ldap driver and just tweaked it a little.  There were some bugs, etc., but I didn't touch the original exim-ldap since there was a possibility that I could be wrong, and I don't have an Exim install to test it on.

With that being said, perhaps it would be better to just create a single LDAP driver with a lot more config. options for the conf.xml.  I'm not all sure what Exim needs to work though, but I'm sure it's something close to what Gnarwl needs.

Additionally, when a person first uses vacation, there is no status bar.  Would it be beneficial to state that Vacation is disabled unless we know for sure it's explicitly enabled?  The reason I say this is because the application in the backend may be setup correctly, but if their account has a blank slate for the settings, it's technically 'disabled' I guess ...

Just some thoughts.

-Mike</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:06:04 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/1834#t7484</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>I agree that we should only have one (more flexible) LDAP dr</title>
   <description>I agree that we should only have one (more flexible) LDAP driver. If this isn't possible, we should have a basic LDAP driver that the Exim and Gnarwl drivers extend. (What is Gnarwl btw?)

I am not sure if I understand correctly was you said about the vacation status, but it sounds right.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 04:45:15 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/1834#t7502</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Gnarwl is an LDAP based autoresponder program.  http://www.h</title>
   <description>Gnarwl is an LDAP based autoresponder program.  http://www.home.unix-ag.org/patrick/index.php?gnarwl

It's a nice little program imo.

What I can do is go through the Exim to see if there are any Params that I'm missing from my Gnarwl implementation and see if I can combine them to create a flexible LDAP driver.

Out of curiousity, does anything jump out at you in terms of what I should include and may have already missed?

-Mike

</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:48:33 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/1834#t7616</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Any news on this?</title>
   <description>Any news on this?</description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:18:19 -0400</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/1834#t12773</link>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>No feedback.</title>
   <description>No feedback.</description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:35:09 -0500</pubDate>
   <link>http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/1834#t14232</link>
  </item>
  

 </channel>
</rss>
